warrants – Radio Free https://www.radiofree.org Independent Media for People, Not Profits. Thu, 05 Jun 2025 16:56:37 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://www.radiofree.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/cropped-Radio-Free-Social-Icon-2-32x32.png warrants – Radio Free https://www.radiofree.org 32 32 141331581 Yemen issues arrest warrants for journalists as harassment of others continues https://www.radiofree.org/2025/06/05/yemen-issues-arrest-warrants-for-journalists-as-harassment-of-others-continues/ https://www.radiofree.org/2025/06/05/yemen-issues-arrest-warrants-for-journalists-as-harassment-of-others-continues/#respond Thu, 05 Jun 2025 16:56:37 +0000 https://cpj.org/?p=484930 Washington, D.C., June 5, 2025—The Committee to Protect Journalists on Thursday condemned the issuance of arrest warrants for three Yemeni journalists and the nine-hour detention of two others, who were forced to delete a Facebook post about an assault. 

The security directorate in eastern Hadramout Governorate issued the three arrest warrants against Sabri bin Mukhshen, Abduljabar Bajabeer, and Muzahim Bajaber based on an April order by the Specialized Criminal Prosecution, which prosecutes high-level cases, including those against journalists. The order did not specify the alleged offense.

The arrest warrants violate Article 13 of Yemen’s Press and Publications Law, which protects journalists from punishment for publishing their opinions unless these break the law. 

On May 23, journalists Abdulrahman Al-Humaidi and Najm Al-Din Al-Subari were detained in Marib over Al-Humaidi’s Facebook post that criticized an armed assault on Al-Subari by a militia member affiliated with the state security forces in the western city of Marib. The journalists said in an official complaint to the Media Freedoms Observatory, a local press freedom group, that they were threatened, had their phones confiscated, and were held without legal justification, and that Al-Humaidi was forced to delete the post and sign a pledge not to report on Marib Governorate without prior approval from its security forces. 

“The arrest warrants against journalists Sabri bin Mukhshen, Abduljabar Bajabeer, and Muzahim Bajaber, and the detention and intimidation of Abdulrahman Al-Humaidi and Najm Al-Din Al-Subari, are further evidence of the alarming decline in press freedom in areas controlled by Yemen’s Internationally Recognized Government,” said CPJ Regional Director Sara Qudah. “We call on the government to immediately drop the arrest warrants, hold those responsible for the illegal detention accountable, and allow all journalists to report freely.”

Yemen has been mired in civil war since 2014, when Houthi rebels ousted the government from the capital Sanaa. In 2015, a Saudi-backed coalition intervened to try and restore the government to power.

Journalists face grave threats in areas controlled by both groups. Violations — ranging from arbitrary detention and enforced disappearance to unfair trials — are carried out with near-total impunity.

CPJ emailed the Ministry of Human Rights for comment but did not immediately receive a response.


This content originally appeared on Committee to Protect Journalists and was authored by CPJ Staff.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2025/06/05/yemen-issues-arrest-warrants-for-journalists-as-harassment-of-others-continues/feed/ 0 536795
Fiji lawyer Nazhat Khan takes up acting top prosecution role at ICC https://www.radiofree.org/2025/05/25/fiji-lawyer-nazhat-khan-takes-up-acting-top-prosecution-role-at-icc/ https://www.radiofree.org/2025/05/25/fiji-lawyer-nazhat-khan-takes-up-acting-top-prosecution-role-at-icc/#respond Sun, 25 May 2025 23:40:52 +0000 https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=115256 By Anish Chand in Suva

Fiji lawyer Nazhat Shameem Khan has been elevated to the top prosecutorial position at the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague.

The Office of the Prosecutor at ICC has announced that deputy prosecutors Nazhat Shameem Khan and Mame Mandiaye Niang have taken over leadership following chief prosecutor Karim AA Khan KC’s temporary leave of absence.

Khan stepped aside on May 16, 2025, pending the outcome of a UN Office of Internal Oversight Services investigation into alleged misconduct.

The ICC states the deputy prosecutors will continue to rely on the support and collaboration of the Rome Statute community, and all partners, in carrying the office’s mandate forward.

In 2014, Nazhat Khan was appointed Fiji’s ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva and Vienna, and to Switzerland and took up the ICC post in 2021.

Pacific Media Watch notes that Chief Prosecutor Karim Khan had issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant for war crimes in Gaza, and also against three Hamas leaders who have been killed in the war on Gaza. In contrast to most of the world’s condemnation and a majority of UN members, Fiji supports Israel and its main backer, United States, in the war.

Republished from The Fiji Times with permission.


This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by Pacific Media Watch.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2025/05/25/fiji-lawyer-nazhat-khan-takes-up-acting-top-prosecution-role-at-icc/feed/ 0 534843
Filipino activists praise arrest of ex-president Duterte as first step to end impunity https://www.radiofree.org/2025/03/28/filipino-activists-praise-arrest-of-ex-president-duterte-as-first-step-to-end-impunity/ https://www.radiofree.org/2025/03/28/filipino-activists-praise-arrest-of-ex-president-duterte-as-first-step-to-end-impunity/#respond Fri, 28 Mar 2025 10:09:20 +0000 https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=112729 Asia Pacific Report

Dozens of Filipinos and supporters in Aotearoa New Zealand came together in a Black Friday vigil and Rally for Justice in the heart of two cities tonight — Auckland and Christchurch.

They celebrated the arrest of former President Rodrigo Duterte by the International Criminal Court (ICC) earlier this month to face trial for alleged crimes against humanity over a wave of extrajudicial killings during his six-year presidency in a so-called “war on drugs”.

Estimates of the killings have ranged between 6250 (official police figure) and up to 30,000 (human rights groups) — including 32 in a single day — during his 2016-2022 term and critics have described the bloodbath as a war against the poor.

But speakers warned tonight this was only the first step to end the culture of impunity in the Philippines.

Current President Fernando Marcos Jr, son of the late dictator, and his adminstration were also condemned by the protesters.

Introducing the rally with the theme “Convict Duterte! End Impunity!” in Freyberg Square in the heart of downtown Auckland, Bagong Alyansang Makabayan’s Eugene Velasco said: “We demand justice for the thousands killed in the bloody and fraudulent war on drugs under the US-Duterte regime.”

She said they sought to:

  • expose the human rights violations against the Filipino people;
  • call for Duterte’s accountability; and
  • to hold Marcos responsible for continuing this reign of terror against the masses.

Flown to The Hague
The ICC issued an arrest warrant for Duterte on March 11. He was immediately arrested on an aircraft at Manila International Airport and flown by charter aircraft to The Hague where he is now detained awaiting trial.

“We welcome this development because his arrest is the result of tireless resistance — not only from human rights defenders but, most importantly, from the families of those who fell victim to Duterte’s extrajudicial killings,” Velasco said.

Filipina activist Eugene Velasco
Filipina activist Eugene Velasco . . . families of victims fought for justice “even in the face of relentless threats and violence from the police and military”. Image: APR

“These families fought for justice despite the complete lack of support from the Marcos administration.”

Velasco said their their courage and resilience had pushed this case forward — “even in the face of relentless threats and violence from the police and military”.

“‘Shoot them dead!’—this was Duterte’s direct order to the Philippine National Police (PNP) and the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP). His death squads carried out these brutal killings with impunity,” Velasco said.

Mock corpses in the Philippines rally
Mock corpses in the Philippines rally in Freyberg Square tonight. Image: APR

But Duterte was not the only one who must be held accountable, she added.

“We demand the immediate arrest and prosecution of all those who orchestrated and enabled the state-sponsored executions, led by figures like Senator Bato Dela Rosa and Lieutenant-Colonel Jovie Espenido, that led to over 30,000 deaths, the militarisation of 47,587 schools, churches, and public institutions — especially in rural areas — the abductions and killings of human rights defenders, and the continued existence of National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict or NTF-ELCAC.”

A masked young speaker tells of many victims of extrajudicial killings
A masked young speaker tells of many victims of extrajudicial killings at tonight’s Duterte rally in Freyberg Square. Image: APR

Fake news, red-tagging
Velasco accused this agency of having “used the Filipino people’s taxes to fuel human rights abuses” through the spread of fake news and red-tagging against activists, peasants, trade unionists, and people’s lawyers.

“The fight does not end here,” she said.

“The Filipino people, together with all justice and peace-loving people of Aotearoa New Zealand, will not stop until justice is fully served — not just for the victims, but for all who continue to suffer under the Duterte-Marcos regime, which remains under the grip of US imperialist interests.

“As Filipinos overseas, we must unite in demanding justice, stand in solidarity with the victims of extrajudicial killings, and continue the struggle for accountability.”

Several speakers gave harrowing testimony about the fate of named victims as their photographs and histories were remembered.

Speakers from local political groups, including Green Party MP Francisco Hernandez, and retired prominent trade unionist and activist Robert Reid, also participated.

Reid referenced the ICC arrest issued last November against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, wanted for war crimes and crimes against humanity related to the Gaza genocide, saying he hoped that he too would end up in The Hague.

Mock corpses surrounded by candles displayed signs — which had been a hallmark of the drug war killings — declaring “Jail Duterte”, “Justice for all victims of human rights” and “Convict Sara Duterte now!” Duterte’s daughter, Sara Duterte is currently Vice-President and is facing impeachment proceedings.

The "convict Duterte" rally and vigil in Freyberg Square
The “convict Duterte” rally and vigil in Freyberg Square tonight. Image: APR


This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by APR editor.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2025/03/28/filipino-activists-praise-arrest-of-ex-president-duterte-as-first-step-to-end-impunity/feed/ 0 522199
NZ Filipino group praises arrest of Duterte over ‘fake drug war’ on poor https://www.radiofree.org/2025/03/12/nz-filipino-group-praises-arrest-of-duterte-over-fake-drug-war-on-poor/ https://www.radiofree.org/2025/03/12/nz-filipino-group-praises-arrest-of-duterte-over-fake-drug-war-on-poor/#respond Wed, 12 Mar 2025 06:58:31 +0000 https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=112064 Asia Pacific Report

A New Zealand-based Filipino solidarity network has welcomed the arrest of former Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte by Interpol on charges of crimes against humanity on a warrant by the International Criminal Court (ICC).

“We congratulate the human rights activists — both from the Philippines and around the world — who held the line and relentlessly pursued justice for Filipino victims of the former Duterte regime,” said the Aotearoa-Philippines Solidarity (APS) in a statement.

“This arrest is a long time coming, with Duterte having been complicit in the extrajudicial killings of activists, trade unionists, indigenous peoples’ advocates, peasants and human rights lawyers since he was president back in 2016.

“His brutal and merciless so-called ‘war on drugs’ also led to the deaths of thousands of Filipinos — many of which were not involved in the drug trade at all or were merely drug addicts and low-level drug peddlers.

“Their only ‘crime’ was that they were poor, as documented by many human rights watchdogs that Duterte’s fake ‘drug war’ disproportionately targeted poor Filipinos.”

The APS statement said that Duterte had admitted to these crimes when he faced an inquiry before the Philippines’ House of Representatives in October last year.

“In that hearing, the former president admitted the existence of ‘death squads’ composed of ‘gang members’ and Philippine police personnel who would ‘neutralise’ drug suspects – both when he was president and as mayor of Davao City.

Police ordered to ‘goad suspects’
“He also [revealed] that he [had] instructed members of the Philippine National Police (PNP) to goad suspects to fight back or attempt to escape so they would have a reason to kill them.”

The APS noted that all these actions constituted crimes against humanity, the very charge laid against him by the ICC. Since the initial charges were laid against Duterte in 2017 by human rights activists, many had anticipated the day he would finally face justice.

“This arrest is a historic step towards justice and a reminder to all that no one is above the law. The APS extends our best wishes to the bereaved families of those killed during Duterte’s unjust ‘war on drugs’ and also its survivors,” the statement said.

The APS said challenge now was to ensure that justice was meted out by the ICC and Duterte was punished for his crimes.

“Let us not allow this monumental victory slip from our hands and ensure that all evidence against Duterte is brought to light and he faces consequences for the human rights violations he committed against the Filipino people.”

The statement said that Duterte’s arrest also served as a “warning to the US-Marcos regime” that any abuse of their powers and attacks on human rights would not go unpunished.

The continuation of indiscriminate military operations which violated international humanitarian law would also lead to the downfall of President Ferdinand Marcos Jr — who is the son of the 1970s dictator who declared martial law.


This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by APR editor.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2025/03/12/nz-filipino-group-praises-arrest-of-duterte-over-fake-drug-war-on-poor/feed/ 0 518299
Drug war victims’ families celebrate Duterte’s arrest, vow to keep fighting https://www.radiofree.org/2025/03/11/drug-war-victims-families-celebrate-dutertes-arrest-vow-to-keep-fighting-2/ https://www.radiofree.org/2025/03/11/drug-war-victims-families-celebrate-dutertes-arrest-vow-to-keep-fighting-2/#respond Tue, 11 Mar 2025 10:22:24 +0000 https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=111998 By Jodesz Gavilan in Manila

Paolo* was just 15 years old when he witnessed the Philippine National Police (PNP) mercilessly kill his father in 2016.

Nearly nine years later, the scales are shifting as Rodrigo Duterte, the man who unleashed death upon his family and thousands of others, now faces the weight of justice before the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Finally, naaresto din, [pero] dapat isama si [Senator Ronald dela Rosa], dapat silang panagutin sa dami ng pamilyang inulila nila. (Finally, he’s arrested but Dela Rosa should’ve been with him, they should be held accountable for how many families they left in mourning),” he said.

TIMELINE: The International Criminal Court and Duterte’s bloody war on drugs
TIMELINE: The International Criminal Court and Duterte’s bloody war on drugs

Paolo, then a minor, was also accosted and tortured by Caloocan police — from the same city police who would kill 17-year-old Kian delos Santos less than a year later.

He was threatened not to do anything else or else end up like his father. Paolo carried the threats and the fear over the years, even as he hoped for justice.

This hanging on for hope in the face of devastation was not for nothing.

Duterte was arrested today by Philippine authorities following the issue of a warrant by the ICC in relation to crimes against humanity committed during his violent war on drugs.

The ICC has been investigating the killings under Duterte’s flagship campaign, which led to at least 6252 deaths in police operations alone by May 2022. The number reached between 27,000 to 30,000, including those killed vigilante-style.

The Presidential Communications Office said that the government received from the Interpol an official copy of a warrant of arrest.

Duterte was presented by the Philippine government’s Prosecutor-General with the ICC notification of an arrest over crimes against humanity upon his arrival from Hong Kong on this morning.

Slow but sure step to justice
Paolo is not the only one rejoicing over Duterte’s arrest. Many families, including those from drug war hot spot Caloocan City, see this as the long-awaited step toward the justice they have been denied for years.

When the news broke, Ana* was overcome with joy and thanked God for giving families the strength and unwavering faith to keep fighting for justice. She knew the weight of loss all too well.

In 2017, police stormed into their home in Caloocan City and brutally killed her husband and father-in-law in a single night.

Ana, who was five months pregnant at that time, was caught in the violence and was hit by a stray bullet. She and other victims have since been supported by the In Defence of Human Rights and Dignity Movement.

Sa wakas, unti-unti nang nakakamit ang hustisya para sa lahat ng biktima (At last, justice is slowly being achieved for all the victims),” she recalled thinking when she read that Duterte had been arrested.

But Ana is wishing for more than just imprisonment for Duterte, even as she welcomed the long-awaited accountability from the former president and his allies.

Sana din ay aminin niya lahat ng kamalian at humingi siya ng kapatawaran sa lahat ng tao na biktima para matahimik din ang mga kaluluwa ng mga namatay (I hope he also admits to all his wrongdoings and asks for forgiveness from every victim, so that the souls of those who were killed may finally find peace),” she said.

Brutality they endured
For the families, the ICC’s move and the government’s action are an acknowledgment of the brutality they endured. The latest development is also a validation of their grief and provides a glimmer of hope that accountability is finally within reach. After years of being silenced and dismissed, they see this moment as the start of a reckoning they feared would never come.

Celina, whose husband was shot dead in a drug war operation, feels overwhelming joy but is wary that the arrest is just part of a long process at the ICC.

Ang sabi nga po, mahaba-habang laban ito kaya hindi po sa pag-aresto natatapos ito, bagkus ito ay simula pa lamang ng aming mga laban [at] naniniwala kami at aasa sa kakayahan at suporta na ibinibigay sa amin ng ICC [na] sa huli, mananagot ang dapat managot, maparusahan ang may mga sala,” she said.

(As they say, this is a long battle, so it does not end with the arrest. Rather, this is only the beginning of our fight. We believe in and will rely on the ICC’s capability and support, knowing that in the end, those who must be held accountable will face justice, and the guilty will be punished.)

‘Duterte should feel our pain’
The wounds left behind by the drug war killings remain deep. The families’ losses are irreversible, yes, but they see this arrest as a long-awaited step toward the justice they have fought for years to achieve.

It is a stark contrast to the reality they have lived following the deaths of their loved ones. They were constantly under threat from the police who pulled the trigger. Many families had to flee to faraway places, leaving behind their own communities and source of livelihood.

Nakakaiyak ako, hindi ko alam ang dapat kong maramdaman na sa ilang taon naming ipinaglalaban ay nakamit din namin ang hustisyang aming minimithi (I’m in tears — I don’t know what to feel. After years of fighting, we have finally achieved the justice we have long been yearning for), said Betty, whose 44-year-old son and 22-year-old grandson were killed under Duterte’s drug war.

For Jane Lee, the arrest only underscores the glaring disparity between the powerful and the powerless.

“Mabuti pa siya, inaresto ng mga kapulisan. Ang aming mga kaanak, pinatay agad,” she said. “Napakalaki ng pagkakaiba sa pagitan ng makapangyarihan at ordinaryong taong tulad namin.”

(At least he was arrested by the police. Our loved ones were killed on the spot. The difference between the powerful and ordinary people like us is enormous.)

Lee’s husband, Michael, was gunned down by unidentified men in May 2017, leaving her to raise their three children alone. Since then, she has volunteered for Rise Up for Life and for Rights, a group composed mostly of widows and mothers who remain steadfast in demanding justice for drug war victims.

Collective rage
Families from Rise Up in Cebu also voiced their collective rage against Duterte who ordered killings from the presidential pulpit for six years. They hope that Duterte will feel the same pain they felt when their loved ones were forcibly taken away from them.

This afternoon, Duterte condemned the alleged violation of due process following his arrest. His allies are also echoing this messaging, calling the arrest unlawful.

His longtime aide, Senator Bong Go, Go, tried to access Duterte in Villamor Air Base, asking the guards to let him deliver pizza since they hadn’t eaten yet.

Katiting lang iyan sa ginawa mo sa amin na sinira mo ang aming buhay at hanapbuhay dahil sa iyong pekeng war on drugs,” the families of drug war victims in Cebu said. “Wala kang karapatan na kumuha ng buhay ng iba [kasi] Diyos lang may karapatan kaya sa ginawa mo, maniningil ang taumbayan lalo na kaming mga pamilya ng mga naging biktima.

(That is nothing compared to what you did to us. You destroyed our lives and livelihood because of your fake war on drugs. You have no right to take another person’s life; only God has that right. Because of what you have done, the people will demand justice, especially we, the families of the victims.)

There is still no clear information on what comes next, whether Duterte will be immediately transferred to the International Criminal Court headquarters in The Hague, Netherlands, or if legal battles will delay the process.

But Mila*, whose 17-year-old nephew was killed by police in Quezon City in 2018, hopes for one thing if the former president finds himself in a detention cell soon: “Sana huwag na siya lumaya (I hope he is never set free).” 

Republished from Rappler with permission.


This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by APR editor.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2025/03/11/drug-war-victims-families-celebrate-dutertes-arrest-vow-to-keep-fighting-2/feed/ 0 518018
Drug war victims’ families celebrate Duterte’s arrest, vow to keep fighting https://www.radiofree.org/2025/03/11/drug-war-victims-families-celebrate-dutertes-arrest-vow-to-keep-fighting/ https://www.radiofree.org/2025/03/11/drug-war-victims-families-celebrate-dutertes-arrest-vow-to-keep-fighting/#respond Tue, 11 Mar 2025 10:22:24 +0000 https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=111998 By Jodesz Gavilan in Manila

Paolo* was just 15 years old when he witnessed the Philippine National Police (PNP) mercilessly kill his father in 2016.

Nearly nine years later, the scales are shifting as Rodrigo Duterte, the man who unleashed death upon his family and thousands of others, now faces the weight of justice before the International Criminal Court (ICC).

Finally, naaresto din, [pero] dapat isama si [Senator Ronald dela Rosa], dapat silang panagutin sa dami ng pamilyang inulila nila. (Finally, he’s arrested but Dela Rosa should’ve been with him, they should be held accountable for how many families they left in mourning),” he said.

TIMELINE: The International Criminal Court and Duterte’s bloody war on drugs
TIMELINE: The International Criminal Court and Duterte’s bloody war on drugs

Paolo, then a minor, was also accosted and tortured by Caloocan police — from the same city police who would kill 17-year-old Kian delos Santos less than a year later.

He was threatened not to do anything else or else end up like his father. Paolo carried the threats and the fear over the years, even as he hoped for justice.

This hanging on for hope in the face of devastation was not for nothing.

Duterte was arrested today by Philippine authorities following the issue of a warrant by the ICC in relation to crimes against humanity committed during his violent war on drugs.

The ICC has been investigating the killings under Duterte’s flagship campaign, which led to at least 6252 deaths in police operations alone by May 2022. The number reached between 27,000 to 30,000, including those killed vigilante-style.

The Presidential Communications Office said that the government received from the Interpol an official copy of a warrant of arrest.

Duterte was presented by the Philippine government’s Prosecutor-General with the ICC notification of an arrest over crimes against humanity upon his arrival from Hong Kong on this morning.

Slow but sure step to justice
Paolo is not the only one rejoicing over Duterte’s arrest. Many families, including those from drug war hot spot Caloocan City, see this as the long-awaited step toward the justice they have been denied for years.

When the news broke, Ana* was overcome with joy and thanked God for giving families the strength and unwavering faith to keep fighting for justice. She knew the weight of loss all too well.

In 2017, police stormed into their home in Caloocan City and brutally killed her husband and father-in-law in a single night.

Ana, who was five months pregnant at that time, was caught in the violence and was hit by a stray bullet. She and other victims have since been supported by the In Defence of Human Rights and Dignity Movement.

Sa wakas, unti-unti nang nakakamit ang hustisya para sa lahat ng biktima (At last, justice is slowly being achieved for all the victims),” she recalled thinking when she read that Duterte had been arrested.

But Ana is wishing for more than just imprisonment for Duterte, even as she welcomed the long-awaited accountability from the former president and his allies.

Sana din ay aminin niya lahat ng kamalian at humingi siya ng kapatawaran sa lahat ng tao na biktima para matahimik din ang mga kaluluwa ng mga namatay (I hope he also admits to all his wrongdoings and asks for forgiveness from every victim, so that the souls of those who were killed may finally find peace),” she said.

Brutality they endured
For the families, the ICC’s move and the government’s action are an acknowledgment of the brutality they endured. The latest development is also a validation of their grief and provides a glimmer of hope that accountability is finally within reach. After years of being silenced and dismissed, they see this moment as the start of a reckoning they feared would never come.

Celina, whose husband was shot dead in a drug war operation, feels overwhelming joy but is wary that the arrest is just part of a long process at the ICC.

Ang sabi nga po, mahaba-habang laban ito kaya hindi po sa pag-aresto natatapos ito, bagkus ito ay simula pa lamang ng aming mga laban [at] naniniwala kami at aasa sa kakayahan at suporta na ibinibigay sa amin ng ICC [na] sa huli, mananagot ang dapat managot, maparusahan ang may mga sala,” she said.

(As they say, this is a long battle, so it does not end with the arrest. Rather, this is only the beginning of our fight. We believe in and will rely on the ICC’s capability and support, knowing that in the end, those who must be held accountable will face justice, and the guilty will be punished.)

‘Duterte should feel our pain’
The wounds left behind by the drug war killings remain deep. The families’ losses are irreversible, yes, but they see this arrest as a long-awaited step toward the justice they have fought for years to achieve.

It is a stark contrast to the reality they have lived following the deaths of their loved ones. They were constantly under threat from the police who pulled the trigger. Many families had to flee to faraway places, leaving behind their own communities and source of livelihood.

Nakakaiyak ako, hindi ko alam ang dapat kong maramdaman na sa ilang taon naming ipinaglalaban ay nakamit din namin ang hustisyang aming minimithi (I’m in tears — I don’t know what to feel. After years of fighting, we have finally achieved the justice we have long been yearning for), said Betty, whose 44-year-old son and 22-year-old grandson were killed under Duterte’s drug war.

For Jane Lee, the arrest only underscores the glaring disparity between the powerful and the powerless.

“Mabuti pa siya, inaresto ng mga kapulisan. Ang aming mga kaanak, pinatay agad,” she said. “Napakalaki ng pagkakaiba sa pagitan ng makapangyarihan at ordinaryong taong tulad namin.”

(At least he was arrested by the police. Our loved ones were killed on the spot. The difference between the powerful and ordinary people like us is enormous.)

Lee’s husband, Michael, was gunned down by unidentified men in May 2017, leaving her to raise their three children alone. Since then, she has volunteered for Rise Up for Life and for Rights, a group composed mostly of widows and mothers who remain steadfast in demanding justice for drug war victims.

Collective rage
Families from Rise Up in Cebu also voiced their collective rage against Duterte who ordered killings from the presidential pulpit for six years. They hope that Duterte will feel the same pain they felt when their loved ones were forcibly taken away from them.

This afternoon, Duterte condemned the alleged violation of due process following his arrest. His allies are also echoing this messaging, calling the arrest unlawful.

His longtime aide, Senator Bong Go, Go, tried to access Duterte in Villamor Air Base, asking the guards to let him deliver pizza since they hadn’t eaten yet.

Katiting lang iyan sa ginawa mo sa amin na sinira mo ang aming buhay at hanapbuhay dahil sa iyong pekeng war on drugs,” the families of drug war victims in Cebu said. “Wala kang karapatan na kumuha ng buhay ng iba [kasi] Diyos lang may karapatan kaya sa ginawa mo, maniningil ang taumbayan lalo na kaming mga pamilya ng mga naging biktima.

(That is nothing compared to what you did to us. You destroyed our lives and livelihood because of your fake war on drugs. You have no right to take another person’s life; only God has that right. Because of what you have done, the people will demand justice, especially we, the families of the victims.)

There is still no clear information on what comes next, whether Duterte will be immediately transferred to the International Criminal Court headquarters in The Hague, Netherlands, or if legal battles will delay the process.

But Mila*, whose 17-year-old nephew was killed by police in Quezon City in 2018, hopes for one thing if the former president finds himself in a detention cell soon: “Sana huwag na siya lumaya (I hope he is never set free).” 

Republished from Rappler with permission.


This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by APR editor.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2025/03/11/drug-war-victims-families-celebrate-dutertes-arrest-vow-to-keep-fighting/feed/ 0 518017
OPINION: Rohingya women are the grassroots advocates behind genocide arrest warrants https://rfa.org/english/opinions/2025/03/08/opinion-rohingya-myanmar-bangladesh-women-genocide/ https://rfa.org/english/opinions/2025/03/08/opinion-rohingya-myanmar-bangladesh-women-genocide/#respond Sat, 08 Mar 2025 15:52:10 +0000 https://rfa.org/english/opinions/2025/03/08/opinion-rohingya-myanmar-bangladesh-women-genocide/ The global celebration of International Women’s Day is a call to action to support and amplify the efforts of the extraordinary girls and women around the world who are tirelessly working within their communities to defend their rights and to empower future generations.

Last month, we saw the Argentinian federal court issue arrest warrants against 25 Myanmar officials, including the seniormost military leaders, for genocide and crimes against humanity committed against the Rohingya community between 2012 and 2018. Our thoughts immediately went to the brave Rohingya women who helped make this significant legal action possible.

For years, the Shanti Mohila (Peace Women), a group of over 400 Rohingya women living in the refugee camps in southeastern Bangladesh, have defied societal expectations and conservative gender norms.

They are leaders in their community fighting for recognition and justice for the harms endured at the hands of the Myanmar military. They play a vital role as leaders, educators, and advocates for justice.

RELATED STORIES

Rohingya women say sexual violence, killings forced them out of Myanmar

Rohingya at risk of being forgotten, activists say

INTERVIEW: Why an Argentine court filed a warrant for Aung San Suu Kyi’s arrest

The 2017 “clearance operations” by the Myanmar military against the historically persecuted Rohingya Muslim minority living in the Rakhine state were a series of widespread and systematic attacks involving mass killings, torture, and destruction of houses that led to the largest forced displacement of the Rohingya community from Myanmar into neighboring Bangladesh.

Sexual violence was a hallmark of these “clearance operations,” with young women and girls disproportionately affected by brutal and inhuman acts of sexual and gender-based violence. Yet, despite efforts to destroy them through long-term serious physical and mental harm, Rohingya women fought back.

Shanti Mohila members participate in a series of art facilitation sessions conducted by Legal Action Worldwide in collaboration with Artolution Inc. in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, in 2024.
Shanti Mohila members participate in a series of art facilitation sessions conducted by Legal Action Worldwide in collaboration with Artolution Inc. in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, in 2024.
(Ayesha Nawshin/Legal Action Worldwide)

Shanti Mohila members have mobilized to raise awareness of the large-scale sexual and gender-based violence endured by Rohingya women between 2016 and 2017. They have spoken about their experiences before international justice proceedings and catalyzed change by breaking down the stigma associated with victimhood and inspiring next generations of Rohingya women through action.

In 2023, their remarkable achievements were recognized as they were honored as Raphael Lemkin Champions of Prevention by the U.N. Office of the Special Adviser on the Prevention of Genocide.

Contributing evidence to justice mechanisms

The testimonies Shanti Mohila members have provided and encouraged other survivors to step forward to provide over the past years have given the opportunity to investigative mechanisms, NGOs, and lawyers to present evidence before all ongoing international justice proceedings.

Specifically, Shanti Mohila members are among the survivors who provided key witness statements in The Gambia v. Myanmar case before the International Court of Justice (ICJ).

In 2019, two representatives were in The Hague as part of The Gambia delegation to observe provisional measures hearings at the ICJ.

In 2023, they were among the group of seven witnesses in Buenos Aires to testify in the investigative hearings under the universal jurisdiction principle before the federal criminal court – leading to the recent court order of the first-ever arrest warrants for crimes of genocide against key state officials and members of the Myanmar military.

“I could not believe I could tell an international court about my sufferings. I could not believe it until I stepped into the courtroom,” said “Salma” (not her real name), a Rohingya female witness who requested anonymity for privacy and safety concerns.

“It was difficult for me to speak about the death of my family and their names, but I did it for justice, for my grandchildren, for a future where we can return home with dignity,” she said. “They [perpetrators] targeted women first to break our community, our morale.”

“Who would have thought that we, the Rohingya women, would one day be taking the Myanmar military to the court?”

It is worth highlighting here why exactly the evidence from survivors of sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) is so critical to successfully prosecute and hold the Myanmar military accountable, particularly for genocide.

The “intent to destroy a group in whole or in part” is a necessary element to prove the crime of genocide, which can be notoriously difficult to evidence.

In the Rohingya context, the scale and brutality of SGBV during the 2017 “clearance operations” was identified by the U.N. Independent Fact-Finding Mission as one of the key factors that “inferred” the Myanmar military’s genocidal intent to destroy the Rohingya people.

Rohingya refugee women hold placards as they take part in a protest at the Kutupalong refugee camp to mark the first year of their exodus in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, Aug. 25, 2018.
Rohingya refugee women hold placards as they take part in a protest at the Kutupalong refugee camp to mark the first year of their exodus in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, Aug. 25, 2018.
(Mohammad Ponir Hossain/Reuters)

Sexual violence against Rohingya women and young mothers in front of their families, and the accompanying sexual mutilations and forced pregnancies, are some of the most significant reflections of the perpetrators’ desire to inflict severe social and reproductive harm on the community.

The SGBV was not only a part of the campaign of mass killings, torture and destruction of property in 2017 but also committed in the context of decades-long propagated narrative that uncontrolled Rohingya birth rate is a threat to the survival of the nation, and state policies that placed significant legal restraint on Rohingya reproductive rights.

In a 2023 study on long-term impact of sexual and gender-based violence against the Rohingya men, women, and hijra conducted by the Legal Action Worldwide (LAW), clinical analysis by psychologists and medical doctors revealed that the SGBV against Rohingya had resulted in: permanent damage to survivors’ genitalia impacting their ability to procreate; severe psychological injuries that have left them in a state of extreme emotional distress; damaged the survivors’ family relations including with their spouse and children; severe ostracization of the women and children born of rape; and forced reorganization of the Rohingya households.

The evidence of SGBV is critical in that its commission and its enduring and foreseeable impact on survivors clearly shows that the Myanmar military inflicted serious mental and bodily harm and imposed measures intending to prevent births within the community. It also reflects a deliberate incremental step in causing the biological or physical destruction of the group while inflicting acute suffering on its members in the process.

Leaders within the Shanti Mohila network have been instrumental in supporting the conceptualization and implementation of studies such as the 2023 report – making them truly the grassroots advocates for the community.

Towards holistic justice and healing

Alongside these important contributions, the Shanti Mohila members continuously work within the camps in Cox’s Bazar to ensure awareness of the ongoing justice processes and provide peer support to one another and the wider community.

Last year, LAW and Shanti Mohila engaged with Rohingya activists around the globe through LAW’s Rohingya Diaspora Dialogue initiative to foster wider recognition and advocacy for the significant work being done by the Rohingya women in Cox’s Bazar on gender equality and to hold the perpetrators of serious crimes responsible.

These actions embody Shanti Mohila’s commitment and openness to learning.

They are dedicated to remaining bold and effective advocates for their community and being against the illegitimate military regime that continues to commit atrocities against civilians across Myanmar.

Shanti Mohila members stand in an embrace in a gesture of support and solidarity, in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, in 2022.
Shanti Mohila members stand in an embrace in a gesture of support and solidarity, in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, in 2022.
(Ayesha Nawshin/Legal Action Worldwide)

The challenges remain plenty since the renewed conflict between Arakan Army and Myanmar military in late 2023 has led to upward of 60,000 Rohingya arriving in Cox’s Bazar in a new wave of forced displacement, joining over 1 million Rohingya refugees already living in the camps.

The evolving conflict dynamics in the Rakhine state and its impact on the Rohingya there add to the tensions in the camps. The risk of another surge in the forced recruitment of the Rohingya in the camps by organized groups pressuring youths to join the civil war in Myanmar persists.

Amid this, the work and growth of Shanti Mohila can prove to be a stabilizing force, beyond their contributions to women empowerment and the justice process. They can provide an avenue to offset the negative impacts of the deteriorating regional security situation through promoting efforts toward reconciliation and encouraging people to keep the rule of law and justice at the center of their struggle.

On this International Women’s Day, we celebrate the groundbreaking work of Shanti Mohila and the power and legacy they are creating for generations of Rohingya women, their community as a whole, and women across fragile and conflict-affected contexts worldwide.

Ishita Kumar, based in Cox’s Bazar, is the legal and program adviser on the Rohingya crisis for Legal Action Worldwide (LAW), an independent, non-profit organization of human rights lawyers and jurists working in fragile and conflict-affected areas. LAW has been supporting Shanti Mohila leaders and representing over 300 Rohingya in the ongoing international justice processes about their treatment in Myanmar, including at the International Court of Justice, International Criminal Court and supporting universal jurisdiction cases in foreign domestic courts such as in Argentina. The views expressed here are hers, not those of Radio Free Asia.


This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by guest commentator Ishita Kumar.

]]>
https://rfa.org/english/opinions/2025/03/08/opinion-rohingya-myanmar-bangladesh-women-genocide/feed/ 0 517514
Cambodian gov’t spokesman calls arrest warrants in Bangkok shooting ‘useless’ https://rfa.org/english/cambodia/2025/02/28/cambodia-thai-arrest-warrant/ https://rfa.org/english/cambodia/2025/02/28/cambodia-thai-arrest-warrant/#respond Fri, 28 Feb 2025 20:20:07 +0000 https://rfa.org/english/cambodia/2025/02/28/cambodia-thai-arrest-warrant/ Thai arrest warrants for two suspected Cambodian accomplices in the fatal shooting of a former opposition lawmaker are “useless” and won’t result in extraditions unless there is direct cooperation between Cambodian and Thai officials, an Interior Ministry spokesman said on Friday.

However, any discussion of sending the two suspects to Thailand would be complicated by Cambodia’s Constitution, which doesn’t allow for the extradition of Cambodian nationals, Ministry of Interior spokesman Khieu Sopheak told Radio Free Asia.

“Now that the warrants have been issued, who will implement it?” he asked. “Can the Thai warrants be implemented by the Cambodian authorities?”

“The Cambodian warrant orders the Cambodian authorities to arrest them, but the warrants are useless,” he said. “We look forward to working together to carry out various tasks in accordance with the laws of each country, as long as they are permitted.”

Lim Kimya, 74, a former member of parliament for the banned opposition Cambodia National Rescue Party and a government critic, was gunned down on Jan. 7 just after arriving in Bangkok.

Thai police have charged the suspected gunman Aekaluck Paenoi, a former Thai Marine who was arrested on Jan. 8 in Cambodia’s Battambang province and extradited to Thailand on Jan. 11.

Thai authorities later issued an arrest warrant for Ly Ratanakrasmey, who they believe masterminded the assassination. He is a former adviser to Senate President Hun Sen, the longtime ruler of Cambodia.

They have also issued an arrest warrant for Pich Kimsrin, who they said followed Lim Kimya on a bus from Cambodia to Bangkok and acted as a so-called “spotter” for Aekaluck.

Both men are in Cambodia and Thailand wants to extradite them.

Echoing a previous statement by Prime Minister Hun Manet, Khieu Sopheak told RFA that the Cambodian government was not involved in the shooting of Lim Kimya.

RELATED STORIES

French ambassador discusses shooting probe with Cambodian police official

Cambodian gov’t official denies role in Bangkok shooting of opposition critic

Widow says shooting of former Cambodian lawmaker was ‘definitely political’

Thai police seek Hun Sen adviser believed linked to Bangkok killing of critic

Radio Free Asia couldn’t immediately reach the Thai Embassy in Cambodia for comment on Friday.

It’s unlikely that Cambodian officials will extradite Ly Ratanaksmey and Pich Kimsrin to Thailand without consistent pressure from Cambodian citizens, as well as the Thai and French governments, said legal and democratic governance expert Vorn Chan Lout.

“We need to encourage everyone, both France and Thailand,” he told RFA. “And if Thailand starts to be active and France starts to be active, I think Cambodia will find it difficult to refuse to cooperate.”

Translated by Yun Samean. Edited by Matt Reed.


This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by RFA Khmer.

]]>
https://rfa.org/english/cambodia/2025/02/28/cambodia-thai-arrest-warrant/feed/ 0 515678
Arrest warrants issued for Aung San Suu Kyi & others over alleged Rohingya genocide | (RFA) https://www.radiofree.org/2025/02/25/arrest-warrants-issued-for-aung-san-suu-kyi-others-over-rohingya-genocide-radio-free-asia-rfa/ https://www.radiofree.org/2025/02/25/arrest-warrants-issued-for-aung-san-suu-kyi-others-over-rohingya-genocide-radio-free-asia-rfa/#respond Tue, 25 Feb 2025 11:56:54 +0000 http://www.radiofree.org/?guid=d2689332a01d3d82509204f71f3984b1
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by Radio Free Asia.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2025/02/25/arrest-warrants-issued-for-aung-san-suu-kyi-others-over-rohingya-genocide-radio-free-asia-rfa/feed/ 0 515117
Barred European Union politician brands Israel as ‘a rogue state’ https://www.radiofree.org/2025/02/25/barred-european-union-politician-brands-israel-as-a-rogue-state/ https://www.radiofree.org/2025/02/25/barred-european-union-politician-brands-israel-as-a-rogue-state/#respond Tue, 25 Feb 2025 11:54:20 +0000 https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=111265

Asia Pacific Report

Israel has now banned another European Union parliamentarian from entering the country, reports Al Jazeera.

The government gave no reasons why Lynn Boylan, who chairs the European Parliament EU-Palestine delegation, was denied entry.

“This utter contempt from Israel is the result of the international community failing to hold them to account,” Boylan, an Irish MP in Brussels, said in a statement.

“Israel is a rogue state, and this disgraceful move shows the level of utter disregard that they have for international law.

“Europe must now hold Israel to account.”

Boylan said she had planned to meet with Palestinian Authority officials, representatives of civil society organisations, and people living under Israeli occupation.

She is a member of the Sinn Fein party in Ireland, which has been among the most vocal countries in criticising the Israeli government over its treatment of Palestinians.

France’s Hassan also refused
Earlier, EU lawmaker Rima Hassan was also refused entry at Ben-Gurion airport and ordered to return to Europe.

“Hassan, who is expected to land from Brussels in the coming hour, consistently works to promote boycotts against Israel in addition to numerous public statements both on social media and in media interviews,” said Israeli Interior Minister Moshe Arbel’s office.

Hassan is a French national of Palestinian origin known for her support of the Palestinian cause and for speaking out against Israel’s war on Gaza.

Kaja Kallas, the EU foreign policy chief, outlined a range of worries about the situation in war-battered Gaza and the occupied West Bank.

“We have constantly called on all parties, including Israel, to respect international humanitarian law,” she said, adding that Europe “cannot hide our concern when it comes to the West Bank”.

ICC raps Merz over warrants
Meanwhile, the International Criminal Court (ICC) has declared that states cannot unilaterally “determine soundness” of its rulings

Earlier, it was reported that Germany’s election winner Friedrich Merz was saying he planned to invite Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to visit the country — despite an ICC war crimes warrant issued for his arrest, which Merz claimed did not apply.

The ICC responded by saying states had a legal obligation to enforce its decisions, and any concerns they may have should be addressed with the court in a timely and efficient manner.

“It is not for states to unilaterally determine the soundness of the court’s legal decisions,” said the ICC in a statement.

Israel rejects the jurisdiction of the court and denies war crimes were committed during its devastating war on Gaza.

Germans feel a special responsibility towards Israel because of the legacy of the Holocaust, and Merz has made clear he is a strong ally. But Germany also has a strong tradition of support for international justice for war crimes.

Amnesty slams ‘shameful silence’
Amnesty International and 162 other civil society organisations and trade unions have signed a joint letter calling on the EU to ban trade and business with Israel’s settlements in occupied Palestinian territory.

“Despite EU consensus about the settlements’ illegality and their link to serious abuses, the EU continues to trade and allow business with them,” the letter said.

This contributes to “the serious and systemic human rights and other international law abuses underpinning the settlement enterprise”, it added.

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) in July issued a landmark advisory opinion affirming that states must not recognise, aid or assist the unlawful situation arising from Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territory.

 


This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by APR editor.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2025/02/25/barred-european-union-politician-brands-israel-as-a-rogue-state/feed/ 0 515121
"Acts of Massacre and Ethnic Cleansing": Haggai Matar on Gaza War, ICC Arrest Warrants & More https://www.radiofree.org/2024/12/03/acts-of-massacre-and-ethnic-cleansing-haggai-matar-on-gaza-war-icc-arrest-warrants-more/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/12/03/acts-of-massacre-and-ethnic-cleansing-haggai-matar-on-gaza-war-icc-arrest-warrants-more/#respond Tue, 03 Dec 2024 16:06:32 +0000 http://www.radiofree.org/?guid=4aacb86f0399f57c8b6c9a6c8f6df9fa
This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/12/03/acts-of-massacre-and-ethnic-cleansing-haggai-matar-on-gaza-war-icc-arrest-warrants-more/feed/ 0 504466
“Acts of Massacre and Ethnic Cleansing”: Haggai Matar on Gaza War, ICC Arrest Warrants & More https://www.radiofree.org/2024/12/03/acts-of-massacre-and-ethnic-cleansing-haggai-matar-on-gaza-war-icc-arrest-warrants-more-2/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/12/03/acts-of-massacre-and-ethnic-cleansing-haggai-matar-on-gaza-war-icc-arrest-warrants-more-2/#respond Tue, 03 Dec 2024 13:46:00 +0000 http://www.radiofree.org/?guid=b7d9c9b331bf658a6b7f230bed1df0d8 Seg3 guest gazadestruction split

We’re joined in our New York studio by +972 Magazine journalist Haggai Matar to discuss the latest developments in Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza. Matar is a former conscientious objector who previously refused to participate in Israel’s mandatory military service during the Second Intifada. At the time, says Matar, he was protesting war crimes committed by former chief of staff of the Israeli military Moshe Ya’alon, who is currently making headlines again after accusing the Israeli military of war crimes. For the Israeli public, which doesn’t “get the news that everyone else in the world is getting,” Ya’alon “just sounds like a madman,” says Matar. He urges protesters around the world to continue pressuring their governments and calling attention to Israel’s “horrific acts of massacre and ethnic cleansing” in an ongoing effort to hold Israel accountable and end its aggression in the region.


This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/12/03/acts-of-massacre-and-ethnic-cleansing-haggai-matar-on-gaza-war-icc-arrest-warrants-more-2/feed/ 0 504481
Luxon says Israeli PM would be arrested if he visits New Zealand https://www.radiofree.org/2024/12/03/luxon-says-israeli-pm-would-be-arrested-if-he-visits-new-zealand/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/12/03/luxon-says-israeli-pm-would-be-arrested-if-he-visits-new-zealand/#respond Tue, 03 Dec 2024 01:31:19 +0000 https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=107701 Asia Pacific Report

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has told a media conference Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would be arrested if he entered New Zealand

“We support the ICC [the International Criminal Court],” Luxon said yesterday.

“We believe in the international rules-based system, we support the ICC, and we would be obligated to do so.”

The NZ prime minister’s comments followed the ICC announcing arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Israel’s former defence minister Yoav Gallant on allegations of war crimes and crimes against humanity in the 13-month war on the besieged Gaza Strip that has killed more than 44,000 people — mostly women and children.

Netanyahu and Gallant are now fugitives from global justice after the ICC issued the arrest warrants against them.

Although Israel — and the US — does not recognise the authority of the ICC, the highest international criminal court, and Netanyahu and Gallant will not turn themselves in, the pair’s world has got a lot smaller.

The Rome Statute, the treaty that established the ICC, includes 124 state parties across six continents.

Legally bound
Under the statute, countries that are part of the ICC are legally bound to enforce its arrest warrants, according to international human rights lawyer Jonathan Kuttab.

“The law operates on the basis of a presumption that people will obey it. That’s how all laws are created,” Kuttab told Al Jazeera.

“You expect everybody to respect the law. Those who don’t respect the law are themselves violating the law.”

He added that there were early signs that countries would not ignore the court’s decision.

Many of Israel’s allies — including several European Union countries — have committed to enforcing the arrest warrants.

The ICC was set up in 2002 to prosecute war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide and the crime of aggression when member states are unwilling or unable to do so themselves. It is based in The Hague in the Netherlands.

The case at the ICC is separate from another legal battle Israel is waging at the top UN court, the International Court of Justice, in which South Africa accuses Israel of genocide, an allegation Israeli leaders deny.

Here is a list of the countries where Netanyahu and Gallant could be detained after the ICC’s decision.

A total of 124 countries are state parties to the Rome Statute
A total of 124 countries are state parties to the Rome Statute, which founded the International Criminal Court. They include 29 nations from the Americas: Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Grenada, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay, and Venezuela. Map: CC AJ Lab


This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by APR editor.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/12/03/luxon-says-israeli-pm-would-be-arrested-if-he-visits-new-zealand/feed/ 0 504375
ICC issues warrants for Crime Minister https://www.radiofree.org/2024/12/01/icc-issues-warrants-for-crime-minister/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/12/01/icc-issues-warrants-for-crime-minister/#respond Sun, 01 Dec 2024 20:09:22 +0000 http://www.radiofree.org/?guid=efed9c6317ec7866da30fd97560ab75e
This content originally appeared on The Grayzone and was authored by The Grayzone.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/12/01/icc-issues-warrants-for-crime-minister/feed/ 0 504276
Gallic Stubbornness: France, Netanyahu and the ICC Arrest Warrants https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/30/gallic-stubbornness-france-netanyahu-and-the-icc-arrest-warrants/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/30/gallic-stubbornness-france-netanyahu-and-the-icc-arrest-warrants/#respond Sat, 30 Nov 2024 17:14:17 +0000 https://dissidentvoice.org/?p=155279 The comity of nations, at least when it comes to international humanitarian law, took a rather curious turn with the announcement by France that it would regard Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s immunity as unimpeachable even before an arrest warrant approved by the International Criminal Court.  This view was expressed despite France claiming to be […]

The post Gallic Stubbornness: France, Netanyahu and the ICC Arrest Warrants first appeared on Dissident Voice.]]>
The comity of nations, at least when it comes to international humanitarian law, took a rather curious turn with the announcement by France that it would regard Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s immunity as unimpeachable even before an arrest warrant approved by the International Criminal Court.  This view was expressed despite France claiming to be a strong proponent of the ICC and international law.

On November 27, Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot had mooted the point on Franceinfo radio that France, while being “very committed to international justice and will apply international law based on its obligations to cooperate with the ICC” had to still consider the limits of the Court’s own statute, which “deals with questions of immunities for certain leaders.”  Giving himself room to exit a potential legal tangle, he merely left it up to “the judicial authorities to decide”.

The central reason for not cooperating with the ICC on this point centres on the play of Articles 27 and 98 of the Rome Statute.  The former makes it clear that, “Immunities or special procedural rules which may attach to the official capacity of a person […] shall not bar the Court from exercising its jurisdiction.”  The provisions of the latter prevent the Court from proceeding with a request for surrender or assistance requiring the requested State “to act inconsistently with its obligations under international law with respect to the State or diplomatic immunity of a person or property of a third State” unless cooperation had been obtained from that third state for a waiver of the immunity.

A statement from France’s Foreign Minister merely served to show that the warrant’s effectualness should be gauged by whether Israel was a member of the Rome Statute, an interpretation as disingenuous as it was inaccurate.  “A state cannot be held to act in a way that is incompatible with its obligations in terms of international law with regards to immunities granted to states which are not party to the ICC.”  It followed that Netanyahu and his ministers had the necessary immunities “and must be taken into consideration should the ICC ask us to arrest them and hand them over.”

Rather shoddy lip service to a proud legal and political tradition supposedly shared by Israel and France follows.  Both shared a “long-standing friendship”.  Both were “democracies committed to the rule of law”.  Both showed “respect for a professional and independent justice system”.  These were remarkable observations, given the provisional measures and opinions issued by the International Court of Justice about Israel’s operations in the Gaza Strip and, more broadly, the Occupied Territories.

These include the genuine risk that genocide is taking place in Gaza (the case begun by South Africa is ongoing), the deprivation of necessities, instances of famine and starvation, and the illegal status of the settlements that involve laws and practices of dispossession and separation constituting racial discrimination and apartheid. And what are we to make of Netanyahu’s authoritarian attack on Israel’s judicial system itself, intended to give more free rein to executive power?

The French approach waters down the effect of the warrants by effectively rejecting ICC jurisdiction over Israel’s officials and commanders, despite the court’s own finding that it had jurisdiction by virtue of Israel’s operations on Palestinian territory and the accession to the Rome Treaty by the Palestinians.  This did not impress the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and its French member organisation, the Ligue des droits de l’Homme (LDH), which emphasised the importance of Article 27.  Suspicion about the effectiveness of international law, according to Nathalie Tehio, President of the LDH, “dangerously undermines it at a time when it is urgently needed.”

Relevantly, Tehio noted that no arguments of any equivalent immunity had ever been raised regarding the ICC warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin, despite Russia not being a party to the Rome Statute.  This revealed a “double standard” that damaged France’s reputation, “particularly in relation to the countries of the South.”

Other countries in the European Union are also flirting with the idea that arresting Netanyahu would simply not be advisable, adopting various slippery arguments.  Italy’s Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani rather missed the point in suggesting that the warrant was not feasible as the Israeli PM would “never go to a country where he can be arrested.”  (His colleague, Defence Minister Guido Crosetto, disagreed.)  With this muddled reading of international justice, Tajani went on to declare that arresting Netanyahu was “unfeasible, at least as long as he is prime minister.”  A closer reading of the Rome Statute would have put Tajani’s dim doubts to rest.

The issue of executing warrants for high-ranking leaders and commanders accused of violating international humanitarian law comes down to sometimes tawdry political calculation over diligent legal observance.  France has merely confirmed this state of affairs, following previous approaches taken by Mongolia (towards Putin) and South Africa (towards Omar al-Bashir).  Having been one of the key negotiating parties behind the fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah that commenced on November 27, Emmanuel Macron and his diplomatic team will not miss out on posterity’s calling.  As the ministry statement promises, “France intends to continue to work in close collaboration with Prime Minister Netanyahu and other Israeli authorities to achieve peace and security in the Middle East.”

The post Gallic Stubbornness: France, Netanyahu and the ICC Arrest Warrants first appeared on Dissident Voice.


This content originally appeared on Dissident Voice and was authored by Binoy Kampmark.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/30/gallic-stubbornness-france-netanyahu-and-the-icc-arrest-warrants/feed/ 0 504150
"A Great Day for Justice": Gaza Lawyer Raji Sourani on ICC Arrest Warrants for Netanyahu & Gallant https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/22/a-great-day-for-justice-gaza-lawyer-raji-sourani-on-icc-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/22/a-great-day-for-justice-gaza-lawyer-raji-sourani-on-icc-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant/#respond Fri, 22 Nov 2024 15:26:05 +0000 http://www.radiofree.org/?guid=4e6c15a13339a1d2f85944d584ff2f52
This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/22/a-great-day-for-justice-gaza-lawyer-raji-sourani-on-icc-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant/feed/ 0 503250
“A Great Day for Justice”: Palestinian Lawyer Raji Sourani on ICC Arrest Warrants for Netanyahu & Gallant https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/22/a-great-day-for-justice-palestinian-lawyer-raji-sourani-on-icc-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/22/a-great-day-for-justice-palestinian-lawyer-raji-sourani-on-icc-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant/#respond Fri, 22 Nov 2024 13:35:31 +0000 http://www.radiofree.org/?guid=328130112e3b2f6c1c9e52f2817bb98e Wx gallant netanyahu

We speak with the celebrated Palestinian human rights lawyer Raji Sourani after the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant over the war in Gaza. Israel called it “an antisemitic decision,” and the Biden administration said it rejects the charges on the grounds that the ICC does not have jurisdiction. But many other countries, including the United Kingdom, Canada, Italy and the Netherlands, have vowed to comply with the court’s decision, which obligates states party to the Rome Statute that established the court to arrest Netanyahu and Gallant if they enter their territory. Sourani, now in Cairo after fleeing Gaza when his house was bombed by Israel, applauds the ICC for withstanding intense pressure from Israel and the United States to carry out its mandate. “They feel they are fully immune, they are free to do whatever they can, they will never be held accountable, and why their appetite for crimes [is] growing like a snowball every day,” Sourani says of the Israeli government.


This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/22/a-great-day-for-justice-palestinian-lawyer-raji-sourani-on-icc-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant/feed/ 0 503178
ICC arrest warrants for Israeli leaders ‘wake up call’ for NZ, says Minto https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/22/icc-arrest-warrants-for-israeli-leaders-wake-up-call-for-nz-says-minto/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/22/icc-arrest-warrants-for-israeli-leaders-wake-up-call-for-nz-says-minto/#respond Fri, 22 Nov 2024 08:26:18 +0000 https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=107307

Asia Pacific Report

A national New Zealand solidarity movement for Palestine has welcomed the International Criminal Court’s move to issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, saying it is a “wake up call” for the coalition government.

“The warrants mean for the first time Israeli leaders face accountability for war crimes which have been live-streamed on social media for the past 13 months” said national chair John Minto of the Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa (PSNA).

“We are waiting for our government to announce it will arrest Netanyahu and Gallant immediately if they set foot in Aotearoa New Zealand.”

Many countries among the 124 members of the ICC have been quick to declare that they would honour the arrest obligations, among them Canada, France and Italy. Also the European Union’s foreign policy chief said all EU countries should abide by the ruling.

“These decisions are binding on all states party to the Rome Statute, which includes all EU member states,” said Joseph Borrell.

Both Israel and its key backer, United States, refuse to recognise the ICC jurisdiction.

PSNA’s Minto said in a statement today: “It’s a breath of fresh air from the stultifying refusal of New Zealand and other Western governments to act against the perpetrators of industrial-scale slaughter of Palestinian civilians.

“This ICC decision is a wake-up call for our government which can no longer stay silent.

“New Zealand has been a staunch ally of the US/Israel throughout the past 13 months when it should have been a staunch defender of international law.

“Unbelievably, our government still refuses to call for an immediate, permanent ceasefire and while it has condemned every act of Palestinian resistance, it has refused to condemn any of the egregious Israeli war crimes which are the subject of the arrest warrants.”

In response to the ICC decision, New Zealand should immediately end support for Israel to continue its war crimes such as:

  • Suspend all satellite launches by Rocket lab for BlackSky Technology, Capella Space, and HawkEye 360. These companies provide imaging data used by Israeli for its targeting of civilian infrastructure in Gaza and Lebanon.
  • Suspend and independently investigate the export of crystal oscillators from Rakon Industries which end up in bombs used for war crimes in Gaza and Lebanon, and
  • Impose sanctions against Israel — they are also essential and the ICC decision can be the trigger.

“New Zealand needs to act as we did when the ICC issued arrest warrants against Russian leader Vladimir Putin for the invasion of Ukraine” said Minto.

“New Zealand imposed immediate and wide-ranging sanctions against Russia and must follow through with Israel.”


This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by APR editor.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/22/icc-arrest-warrants-for-israeli-leaders-wake-up-call-for-nz-says-minto/feed/ 0 503067
Sanders praises arrest warrants for Israeli leaders and warns against ‘further barbarism’ over Gaza https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/22/sanders-praises-arrest-warrants-for-israeli-leaders-and-warns-against-further-barbarism-over-gaza/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/22/sanders-praises-arrest-warrants-for-israeli-leaders-and-warns-against-further-barbarism-over-gaza/#respond Fri, 22 Nov 2024 05:50:25 +0000 https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=107287 Asia Pacific Report

Independent US Senator Bernie Sanders says he supports the International Criminal Court’s arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, and Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif, saying “all launched indiscriminate attacks against civilians and caused unimaginable human suffering”.

“If the world does not uphold international law, we will descend into further barbarism,” he said in a post on X, alongside a longer statement.

“I agree with the ICC,” Sanders added.

His statement mirrored global reaction in favour of the ICC indictments in contrast to most US and Israeli politicians who condemned the global legal move to see accountability for the repeated and continuous Israeli atrocities in the besieged enclave Gaza.

On Wednesday, Sanders sought to block US supplies of offensive weapons to Israel but his draft law was heavily defeated.

The defendants are now internationally wanted suspects and ICC member states are under legal obligation to arrest them. Neither the US nor Israel recognise ICC jurisdiction.

The court said it had issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant for “crimes against humanity and war crimes committed from at least 8 October until at least 20 May, 2024” and which related to the use of starvation and the deliberate targeting of medical facilities.

‘Important precedent’
Dr Francis Boyle, a professor of international law at the University of Illinois, called the ICC’s latest move a “very important precedent”.

“In my opinion, if the ICC had prosecuted Israeli leaders after Operation Cast Lead . . .  maybe all of this could have been avoided, if prosecutions were initiated 15 years ago,” Boyle told Al Jazeera.

Boyle said the Biden administration is guilty of “aiding and abetting Israeli war crimes, crimes against humanity, and outright genocide against the Palestinians”.

He said this was a “far more serious genocide against the Palestinians in Gaza than was inflicted on the Bosnians,” referring to the timeframes of each genocide in comparison with the number of people killed.

Israel is now “extending this to Lebanon, and it does appear the [occupied] West Bank is next in its sights,” Boyle said.

“It’s a very serious situation.

An international human rights lawyer, Michael Mansfield, described Israel is an “unjust state that has never respected the rule of law”.

Israel was trying to “deflect responsibility” and its objective had been to destroy Gaza and make it “uninhabitable”, he said.

Netanyahu would not end the war in Gaza, he said, until this objective was met.

“If he ends the war, he is in trouble. He’s in trouble if he leaves the country … and if he stays in Israel . . . he’s awaiting prosecution there,” Mansfield said.

The issuing of the ICC warrants “makes a difference to world opinion, because I don’t think that the regime in Israel have recognised the extent in which they are being isolated — morally isolated”, he said.


This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by APR editor.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/22/sanders-praises-arrest-warrants-for-israeli-leaders-and-warns-against-further-barbarism-over-gaza/feed/ 0 503041
‘Wanted’ for war crimes over Gaza: Israel’s Netanyahu, Gallant face ICC arrest warrants https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/21/wanted-for-war-crimes-over-gaza-israels-netanyahu-gallant-face-icc-arrest-warrants/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/21/wanted-for-war-crimes-over-gaza-israels-netanyahu-gallant-face-icc-arrest-warrants/#respond Thu, 21 Nov 2024 23:54:28 +0000 https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=107268 Democracy Now!

NERMEEN SHAIKH: In The Hague, the International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant for crimes against humanity and war crimes committed during Israel’s assault on Gaza.

In a statement, the ICC said the Israeli leaders had, “intentionally and knowingly deprived the civilian population in Gaza of objects indispensable to their survival, including food, water, and medicine and medical supplies, as well as fuel and electricity.”

The ICC also issued an arrest warrant for Hamas military commander Mohammed Deif, although Israel’s military claims it killed Deif in a July airstrike.

The ICC arrest warrants come a week after a UN special committee found Israel’s actions in Gaza since October 2023 are, “consistent with genocide,” including using starvation as a weapon of war and recklessly inflicting civilian casualties.

AMY GOODMAN: In related news, on Wednesday, the United States vetoed a Gaza ceasefire resolution at the UN Security Council for the fourth time, and the US Senate rejected a resolution brought by Senator Bernie Sanders that sought to block the sale of US tank rounds, bomb kits and other lethal weapons to Israel. Nineteen senators supported blocking the arms.

For more on all of this, we’re joined by Akbar Shahid Ahmed, senior diplomatic correspondent for HuffPost. His latest piece is “Exclusive: White House Says Democrats Who Oppose Weapons to Israel Are Aiding Hamas.”

Ahmed, thank you so much for being with us. As you write your book on the Biden administration in Gaza called Crossing the Red Line, clearly the ICC has ruled that today by issuing arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as well as the former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant.

Can you talk about the significance of this move?

AKBAR SHAHID AHMED: Yeah, Amy. This is just an absolutely huge development, and it’s significant for a number of reasons. It’s significant because the ICC has come out and amplified and affirmed the allegations of crimes against humanity, of war crimes. This is one more international body.

These are . . . international charges with a great deal of respect. This is a court that most of the world is a member of. And they’re coming out and saying, “Look, we think there are reasonable grounds to believe that these major international red lines have been crossed by the Israelis.”

What’s really important to remember is that this isn’t just a decision about Israel. By extension, it fundamentally is a decision about the United States, which has been the ultimate enabler of Israel’s offensives in Gaza and Lebanon, which are under consideration by the ICC.

And even in this ICC statement today, they point out that in the situations where Israel has addressed concerns over what it describes as starvation as a method of warfare — right? — depriving civilians, Palestinians, of food, water and medical equipment, Israel has really only done so in an extremely arbitrary and, what the ICC judges call, conditional way in response to the US. So, fundamentally, Amy, what we’re seeing is the ICC is saying yet again that Israel and the US, as its major enabler and backer, are in the dark and will continue to be in the dark for years to come.

This kind of adds to a broader picture in which there are now ICC warrants for the sitting Israeli prime minister and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, who remains a significant politician in Israel. Simultaneously, there’s the genocide case at the ICJ, the International Court of Justice, which is ongoing and will be ongoing for years to come.

And there’s the Geneva Conventions conference underway next year regarding kind of similar issues — right? — violations of international law, laws of war and the Israeli grave abuses that are alleged. So, the US and Israel will be kind of on trial on the international stage for years to come.


‘Wanted for war crimes in Gaza.’        Video: Democracy Now!

NERMEEN SHAIKH: So, Akbar, would you say that this move is mostly a symbolic one? Because, as you pointed out, of course, most countries are members of the International Criminal Court, but in this instance, perhaps most importantly, neither Israel nor the US are.

AKBAR SHAHID AHMED: Right, Nermeen. And that’s something that the ICC judges did get into today — right? — because Israel said, “Look, the International Criminal Court doesn’t have jurisdiction over us.” That said, the state of Palestine is a member of the court, and that’s why this becomes a relevant and interesting thing, because you’ve seen European nations recognise Palestine as a state. You’ve seen Palestine join the United Nations General Assembly over just last year.

So, yes, while the US and Israel continue to reject international scrutiny by the ICC, by the ICJ, of Israel’s conduct in Gaza and the occupied West Bank and Lebanon, there’s a growing international push to kind of challenge that, right?

And I think you will see the Biden administration and the incoming Trump administration assertively push back against the ICC. The Trump administration did actually target the ICC directly when President Trump was last in office, threatening to put sanctions on ICC officials. And we also know from reporting that the Israelis have spied on and threatened the ICC themselves, according to reporting by The Guardian. So, yes, there will be increased pressure.

But I think we’re really in a place that no one thought we would be even a few months ago, right? I think even the prospect of the ICC prosecutor successfully getting these warrants issued, it was initially thought that would be quite quick. It’s taken a long time. The fact that judges were able to issue those warrants suggests that even though it’s an uphill battle to get this international scrutiny, there’s a real determination and clear will.

And we’ve seen a lot of states turn around and say over 13 months, right? Since the October 7 attack by Hamas within Israel that did spark this current round of fighting, there have been calls to say, “We don’t want this to escalate,” right?

The US’s allies, Western countries have said, “We want to resolve this. We don’t want you on trial. Can the US and Israel please change course?” And what you’ve seen is a defiance from Tel Aviv and from Washington to say, “Actually, no, we’re continuing these wars.”

So, that does take it to a different forum to kind of change the policy.

NERMEEN SHAIKH: And, Akbar, could you also — while we’re looking at the way in which international organisations, multilateral ones, are responding to this, what about the latest vote at the Security Council and the fact that the US blocked it for the fourth time, a ceasefire vote?

AKBAR SHAHID AHMED: It’s really striking at this point — right? — to see the Biden administration totally alone. And you see how this develops over the course of the war. Initially, the US was able to get Britain, even France, kind of abstaining, standing with them.

And now, 13 months in, where conduct hasn’t changed, and you still have daily strikes that are killing dozens, sometimes over a hundred civilians, you have a mounting death toll of mostly women and children, the US is totally alone, where it’s shielding Israel on the world stage diplomatically.

And this is really important to see in the context of the Biden administration as an outlier even among American presidents and administrations. When President Barack Obama was in office, after he was in the lame-duck period that Biden is in now, he actually did abstain at the UN Security Council and said, “You know what? Go ahead and pass a resolution that Israel doesn’t like,” because tacitly the US acknowledged there was a basis, there were credible grounds for that resolution, which in that instance was about Israeli settlement activity.

Here, what you’re seeing from the Biden administration, even in their dying days — right? — two months to go, there’s an obstinacy, a defiance, and a real commitment to shielding Israel, even if they are totally alone against now their closest allies — Britain, France and everyone else on the Security Council.

So, I think the context of that veto kind of presages whatever may come in the next two months in terms of the Biden administration allowing any UN scrutiny of the wars.

AMY GOODMAN: Akbar, I want to play Palestine’s envoy to the United Nations, Majed Bamya, speaking yesterday.

MAJED BAMYA: There is no right to mass killing of civilians. There is no right to starve an entire civilian population. There is no right to forcibly displace a people. And there is no right to annexation. This is what Israel is doing in Gaza. …

Maybe for some, we have the wrong nationality, the wrong faith, the wrong skin color. But we are humans! And we should be treated as such. Is there a UN Charter for Israel that is different from the charter we all have? Tell us. Is there an international law for them, an international law for us? Do they have the right to kill, and the only right we have is to die?

Republished under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States Licence.


This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by APR editor.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/21/wanted-for-war-crimes-over-gaza-israels-netanyahu-gallant-face-icc-arrest-warrants/feed/ 0 503014
Wanted for War Crimes: ICC Issues Arrest Warrants for Netanyahu & Gallant over Gaza https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/21/wanted-for-war-crimes-icc-issues-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant-over-gaza-2/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/21/wanted-for-war-crimes-icc-issues-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant-over-gaza-2/#respond Thu, 21 Nov 2024 15:37:13 +0000 http://www.radiofree.org/?guid=a3678d55410ccb540761408356560a4d
This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/21/wanted-for-war-crimes-icc-issues-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant-over-gaza-2/feed/ 0 503036
Wanted for War Crimes: ICC Issues Arrest Warrants for Netanyahu & Gallant over Gaza https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/21/wanted-for-war-crimes-icc-issues-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant-over-gaza/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/21/wanted-for-war-crimes-icc-issues-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant-over-gaza/#respond Thu, 21 Nov 2024 13:12:42 +0000 http://www.radiofree.org/?guid=80b7d4fd29b051094c50b2e3d3bd3ae2 Seg1 netanyahu gallant split

The International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for crimes against humanity and war crimes committed during Israel’s assault on Gaza. The court also issued a warrant for Hamas’s military chief Mohammed Deif, whom Israel said they killed in August. This is a major development on the international stage, says HuffPost correspondent Akbar Shahid Ahmed, particularly in its implications for U.S. culpability in Israeli war crimes. The Biden administration, as Netanyahu’s “ultimate enabler,” is visibly “totally alone” in its refusal to recognize Israel’s crossing of “red lines,” as even its ally nations who are party to the ICC are now legally required to cooperate with the court’s decision.


This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/21/wanted-for-war-crimes-icc-issues-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant-over-gaza/feed/ 0 503031
“A Great Day for Justice”: Palestinian Lawyer Raji Sourani on ICC Warrants for Netanyahu & Gallant https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/21/a-great-day-for-justice-palestinian-lawyer-raji-sourani-on-icc-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/21/a-great-day-for-justice-palestinian-lawyer-raji-sourani-on-icc-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant/#respond Thu, 21 Nov 2024 13:00:00 +0000 http://www.radiofree.org/?guid=0abc92bd47006c93209839917c42d2fe
This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! Audio and was authored by Democracy Now!.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/11/21/a-great-day-for-justice-palestinian-lawyer-raji-sourani-on-icc-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant/feed/ 0 502968
Could These Arrest Warrants Signal the Beginning of the End for the “Axis of Evil”? https://www.radiofree.org/2024/05/25/could-these-arrest-warrants-signal-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-the-axis-of-evil/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/05/25/could-these-arrest-warrants-signal-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-the-axis-of-evil/#respond Sat, 25 May 2024 19:13:06 +0000 https://dissidentvoice.org/?p=150623 UK foreign secretery Lord David Cameron has told peers: “I don’t believe for one moment that seeking these warrants is going to help get the hostages out, it’s not going to help get aid in and it’s not going to help deliver a sustainable ceasefire. To draw moral equivalence between the Hamas leadership and the […]

The post Could These Arrest Warrants Signal the Beginning of the End for the “Axis of Evil”? first appeared on Dissident Voice.]]>
UK foreign secretery Lord David Cameron has told peers: “I don’t believe for one moment that seeking these warrants is going to help get the hostages out, it’s not going to help get aid in and it’s not going to help deliver a sustainable ceasefire. To draw moral equivalence between the Hamas leadership and the democratically-elected leader of Israel I think is just plain wrong.”

He misses the point as usual. The warrants have nothing to do with that. They are about bringing those wanted for the most grievous war crimes to justice.

Prime minister Rishi Sunak then said that the move was “deeply unhelpful”, adding: “There is no moral equivalence between a democratic state exercising its lawful right to self defence and the terrorist group Hamas.”

Even Biden was singing off the same hymn-sheet saying there is “no equivalence – none – between Israel and Hamas” and that what’s happening in Gaza is not genocide…. a hymn of praise for Israel almost.

Of course there is no moral equivalence. As the world has witnessed, Israel’s crimes are a thousand times greater than Hamas’s and are allowed to continue without let-up, courtesy of the US and UK who dutifully carry on supplying the ordnance and weaponry. It still hasn’t penetrated enough Washington and Whitehall skulls that it is the Palestinian resistance who are exercising their lawful right to self-defence – using “armed struggle” if necessary – against Israel’s illegal military occupation, brutal 17-year blockade and decades-long murderous oppression (UN Resolutions 37/43 and 3246).

Furthermore Hamas are just as legitimate as any Israeli administration having been democratically elected under the scrutiny of international observers, a result immediately rejected at the time by the UK, Israel and the US because it didn’t happen to suit their evil purpose in the Middle East.

And why are Hamas proscribed as a terrorist organisation in the UK? Only because a group of Israel’s pimps and stooges among Westminster’s political elite say so. It would be interesting to take a vote on what the people who put them there actually think, now they know the horrendous situation in Gaza and the West Bank and the long history leading up to it. Wouldn’t it be more appropriate to proscribe Likud, Netyanyahu’s terrorist party?

Cameron also claims it’s a mistake to draw moral equivalence because Palestine is not regarded as a state. Again, he isn’t paying attention. 146 of the 193 UN member states recognise Palestine, including Ireland, Norway and Spain who announced recognition just a few days ago. 11 of these are EU states, so what is Cameron drivelling about?

Fortunately, a cross-party group of 105 MPs and Lords has called on the UK Government “to do all it can to support the International Criminal Court” after Prime Minister Sunak’s remark that its decision to seek arrest warrants for Israeli and Hamas leaders was “deeply unhelpful”. In a letter addressed to Foreign Secretary Cameron they say “there is mounting evidence that Israel has committed clear and obvious violations of international law in Gaza and we strongly believe that those responsible must be held to account”. They call on the Government “to take a clear stance against any attempts to intimidate an independent and impartial international court…. The Court, its Prosecutor, and all its staff must be free to pursue justice without fear or favour”.

One of the organisers, MP Richard Burgon, said: “At every stage, our Government has failed to fulfil its moral duty to do everything it can to help save lives and prevent suffering in Gaza. It must not fail again. It must back the ICC in ensuring that there is no impunity for war crimes and it must stand up to those seeking to impede justice.”

Almost straightaway Sunak, in a surprise move, called a general election for 4 July. This means that MPs immediately cease being MPs but ministers continue in office until a new government is formed. For the next 6 weeks, then, Sunak’s crew continue to rule without being accountable to the House of Commons and could do a lot of damage. So this is a doubly dangerous time for our nation.

Meanwhile Cameron and his ignorant friends seem to think the Gaza war only started as recently as October 7. He plays up the release of 134 Israeli hostages when, on October 6 Israel was holding 5,200 Palestinians captive, including at least 170 children, and since then has abducted some 7,350 more. Why do we never hear from Cameron about the Palestinian hostages/prisoners?

And how many Palestinians had Israel killed before October 7? Answer: 10,651 slaughtered by Israel in the 23 years up to Oct 7, including 2,270 children and 656 women (Israel’s B’Tselem figures). That’s 460 a year. In that period Israel was exterminating Palestinians at the rate of 8:1 and children at the rate of 16:1.

Israel’s friends in the West like to think of Netanyahu as the leader of a Western style democracy that shares our values. Actually he’s the head of a nasty little ethnocracy with vicious apartheid policies and a 76-year record of terrorism, pursuing an extended military campaign aimed at occupying and annexing another people’s lands and resources, and showing no respect whatsoever for British values or international norms of behaviour.

So, putting aside for a moment our dislike of Hamas’s methods, shouldn’t we be asking our politicians to explain why exactly Hamas must be eliminated and the Palestinians’ homeland pulverised in the process, seeing as it is they who are under illegally military occupation and they who have the ultimate right of self-defence?

It’s easy to see where Cameron is coming from. After 3 months of genocide in Gaza, he denied Israel had broken international law. He also said it was “nonsense” to suggest that Israel intended to commit genocide. Asked if he thought Israel had a case to answer at the ICJ, he said: “No, I absolutely don’t. I think the South African action is wrong, I think it is unhelpful, I think it shouldn’t be happening…. I take the view that Israel is acting in self-defence after the appalling attack on October 7. But even if you take a different view to my view, to look at Israel, a democracy, a country with the rule of law, a country with armed forces that are committed to obeying the rule of law, to say that that country, that leadership, that armed forces, that they have intent to commit genocide, I think that is nonsense, I think that is wrong.”

So says this self-declared zionist and key stooge for Israel, one of many at Westminster who are desperate to maintain the shady US/UK-Israel alliance. Do Sunak, Cameron & co really want victory for the genocidists? It seems they do. Because they’ve pledged their undying adoration and support for that rotten apartheid regime and now the world has seen it for what it really is and their position is turning sour.

On the face of it the Hamas trio — Haniyeh, Sinwar and Dief — with competent legal representation seem likely to survive the legal process. And although many are questioning why arrest warrants are being considered for them at the same time as the mega-maniac Netanyahu there is reason to hope that, if they do come to trial, a lot of bad stuff about Israel, the US and the UK will come out. The world will then be much wiser and the ‘axis of evil’ behind it all will collapse under the weight of its own lunacy.

The UK general election will likely rid us of Sunak, Cameron and the rest of the Tory nitwits. But sitting in the waiting room is Labour’s Keir Starmer, another Israel stooge. Yes, the zionists have all angles covered.

The post Could These Arrest Warrants Signal the Beginning of the End for the “Axis of Evil”? first appeared on Dissident Voice.


This content originally appeared on Dissident Voice and was authored by Stuart Littlewood.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/05/25/could-these-arrest-warrants-signal-the-beginning-of-the-end-for-the-axis-of-evil/feed/ 0 476433
What Happens Now That The ICC Is Seeking Arrest Warrants For Israeli, Hamas Leaders? https://www.radiofree.org/2024/05/22/what-happens-now-that-the-icc-is-seeking-arrest-warrants-for-israeli-hamas-leaders/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/05/22/what-happens-now-that-the-icc-is-seeking-arrest-warrants-for-israeli-hamas-leaders/#respond Wed, 22 May 2024 15:28:09 +0000 http://www.radiofree.org/?guid=133f70fd514d3025282d99dae5df1744
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and was authored by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/05/22/what-happens-now-that-the-icc-is-seeking-arrest-warrants-for-israeli-hamas-leaders/feed/ 0 475866
ICC prosecutor requests arrest warrants for three Hamas leaders and two senior Israeli officials https://www.radiofree.org/2024/05/22/icc-prosecutor-requests-arrest-warrants-for-three-hamas-leaders-and-two-senior-israeli-officials/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/05/22/icc-prosecutor-requests-arrest-warrants-for-three-hamas-leaders-and-two-senior-israeli-officials/#respond Wed, 22 May 2024 08:56:24 +0000 http://www.radiofree.org/?guid=556e2dedd99055b323d3796cc3aadf89
This content originally appeared on Human Rights Watch and was authored by Human Rights Watch.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/05/22/icc-prosecutor-requests-arrest-warrants-for-three-hamas-leaders-and-two-senior-israeli-officials/feed/ 0 475766
What would the ICC issuing arrest warrants mean for Israeli leaders? https://www.radiofree.org/2024/05/20/what-would-the-icc-issuing-arrest-warrants-mean-for-israeli-leaders/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/05/20/what-would-the-icc-issuing-arrest-warrants-mean-for-israeli-leaders/#respond Mon, 20 May 2024 21:00:23 +0000 http://www.radiofree.org/?guid=2a7321f2057655793b64398d48430090
This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/05/20/what-would-the-icc-issuing-arrest-warrants-mean-for-israeli-leaders/feed/ 0 475532
On the ICC’s Announcement of Arrest Warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant and Hamas’ Leadership https://www.radiofree.org/2024/05/20/on-the-iccs-announcement-of-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant-and-hamas-leadership/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/05/20/on-the-iccs-announcement-of-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant-and-hamas-leadership/#respond Mon, 20 May 2024 15:46:28 +0000 https://www.counterpunch.org/?p=323355 The decision to announce these applications for arrest warrants prior to their formal approval may have been motivated by a sense that the conditions under which the people of Gaza are striving to survive are deteriorating so rapidly and horrifically that there is no time to waste and by a hope that announcing the applications now might have a positive impact on the decisions of relevant decision-makers for whom arrest warrants are not yet being sought but could be sought later. More

The post On the ICC’s Announcement of Arrest Warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant and Hamas’ Leadership appeared first on CounterPunch.org.

]]>

Karim Khan, chief prosecutor, International Criminal Court. Photo: ICC.

It had been widely anticipated that, to maintain any institutional respect, the International Criminal Court would have to indict some Israeli leaders, unavoidably including Prime Minister Netanyahu, in connection with the Gaza genocide and that, for balance, it would choose to indict at least one Hamas leader at the same time.

Its announcement Monday of applications for five arrest warrants and the strong language of its announcement, particularly coming from a British Prosecutor who had previously been suspected of being totally subservient to the British government, is excellent news.

However, it offered three surprises:

(1) ANNOUNCING APPLICATIONS FOR ARREST WARRANTS

It is normal ICC practice to announce the issuance of arrest warrants only after the court’s judges have approved them on the basis of an application from the Prosecutor.

This was the procedure followed last year when the court announced the issuance of arrest warrants for President Putin and for Russia’s commissioner for children’s rights.

The decision to announce these applications for arrest warrants prior to their formal approval may have been motivated by a sense that the conditions under which the people of Gaza are striving to survive are deteriorating so rapidly and horrifically that there is no time to waste and by a hope that announcing the applications now might have a positive impact on the decisions of relevant decision-makers for whom arrest warrants are not yet being sought but could be sought later.

(2) NOT SEEKING AN ARREST WARRANT AGAINST GENERAL HALEVI

When rumors of imminent ICC indictments started swirling several weeks ago, three Israeli leaders were cited as targeted — Prime Minister Netanyahu, Defense Minister Gallant and General Herzi Halevi, Chief of General Staff of the IDF. Arrest warrants are now being sought only against Netanyahu and Gallant.

The Prosecutor may be hoping that not indicting General Halevi or other top military officers for the time being while stating explicitly that his office “will not hesitate to submit further applications for warrants” if conditions are met might encourage them, in their own self-interests, to try to rein in their poltical leadership and to wind down or even wind up Israel’s genocidal assault against the people of Gaza.

(3) SEEKING AN ARREST WARRANT AGAINST ISMAIL HANIYEH

It was widely reported at the time that Hamas Political Bureau head Ismail Haniyeh and other members of the external leadership of Hamas had no advance knowledge of the October 7 operation, which makes attributing “criminal responsibility” to Haniyeh for the events of that day surprising.

It is possible that, in the hope of mitigating American fury and the publicly threatened American retaliation for any indictments of Israelis, the Prosecutor thought it desirable to seek arrest warrants for more Palestinians than Israelis. Within Gaza, Yahya Sinwar and Mohammed Deif are the only widely recognized personalities to whom responsibility might be attributed. Hence, perhaps Haniyeh was added to achieve the desired Palestinian majority.

In these circumstances, it is possible that the court’s “independent judges” might show their independence by not issuing an arrest warrant against Haniyeh, which should not upset the Prosecutor if he was adding Haniyeh primarily to achieve a Palestinian majority.

If an arrest warrant were to be issued against Haniyeh, he might, with good reasons to hope for an acquittal, choose to turn himself in to the court and, thereby, to set a good example for (and contrast to) Netanyahu and Gallant.

Indeed, Sinwar and Dief might at least be tempted to do likewise if they could find a way to be safely extricated from the Gaza Strip.

Since October 7, their future has offered only martyrdom — and not necessarily a quick and easy one. They may well be reconciled to martyrdom or actively seek it, but they could also view the chance to live out their natural lives and to defend themselves and their acts on the basis of the right of an occupied and oppressed people to self-defense against perpetual occupation and oppression and on the basis of 10/7 Truth as a viable and even attactive alternative.

It has also been widely reported that Netanyahu is personally obsessed with killing Sinwar and Deif and determined to pursue his assault against Gaza until he achieves that goal.

If that goal were to become impossible because Sinwar and Deif had successfully turned themselves in to the court, thousands of lives might be saved.

The post On the ICC’s Announcement of Arrest Warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant and Hamas’ Leadership appeared first on CounterPunch.org.


This content originally appeared on CounterPunch.org and was authored by John Whitbeck.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/05/20/on-the-iccs-announcement-of-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant-and-hamas-leadership/feed/ 0 475482
Int’l Criminal Court Seeks Arrest Warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant & Hamas Leaders for War Crimes https://www.radiofree.org/2024/05/20/intl-criminal-court-seeks-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant-hamas-leaders-for-war-crimes/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/05/20/intl-criminal-court-seeks-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant-hamas-leaders-for-war-crimes/#respond Mon, 20 May 2024 12:23:43 +0000 http://www.radiofree.org/?guid=1ef261f7f3663e96a370df97ce39a2c9 Netanyahuicc

The chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court has announced he is seeking arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant and three leaders of Hamas: Yahya Sinwar, Ismail Haniyeh and Mohammed Deif. The charges against Netanyahu and Gallant include starvation of civilians, extermination, intentionally directing attacks against a civilian population, among other crimes. The charges against the Hamas leaders include extermination, murder, taking hostages, rape, among other crimes. “It places Israel’s leaders of this genocidal onslaught on the Gaza Strip in the dock,” says Middle East analyst Mouin Rabbani, who explains why this will be “very significant” for Israel’s allies and signatories to the ICC. “They now have to make a choice between Israeli impunity and obligations under the Rome Statute.”


This content originally appeared on Democracy Now! and was authored by Democracy Now!.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/05/20/intl-criminal-court-seeks-arrest-warrants-for-netanyahu-gallant-hamas-leaders-for-war-crimes/feed/ 0 475579
ICC Issues Arrest Warrants For Two Top Russian Commanders https://www.radiofree.org/2024/03/06/icc-issues-arrest-warrants-for-two-top-russian-commanders/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/03/06/icc-issues-arrest-warrants-for-two-top-russian-commanders/#respond Wed, 06 Mar 2024 13:34:50 +0000 http://www.radiofree.org/?guid=87de904cf63cecdf0a099a169d906953
This content originally appeared on Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and was authored by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/03/06/icc-issues-arrest-warrants-for-two-top-russian-commanders/feed/ 0 462411
Bulgaria Issues Warrants For Six Russians Accused Of Destroying Arms Warehouses https://www.radiofree.org/2024/01/30/bulgaria-issues-warrants-for-six-russians-accused-of-destroying-arms-warehouses/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/01/30/bulgaria-issues-warrants-for-six-russians-accused-of-destroying-arms-warehouses/#respond Tue, 30 Jan 2024 17:26:24 +0000 https://www.rferl.org/a/bulgaria-arms-explosions-warrants-russia/32798423.html French President Emmanuel Macron urged Europe's leaders to find ways to "accelerate" aid to Ukraine as Russia continued to pound the EU hopeful with missiles.

"We will, in the months to come, have to accelerate the scale of our support," Macron said in a speech on January 30 during a visit to Sweden. The "costs...of a Russian victory are too high for all of us."

EU leaders will meet in Brussels on February 1 for a meeting of the European Council, where they will discuss aid to Ukraine as the war approaches its second anniversary.

Ukraine continues to hold off large-scale Russian grounds attacks in the east but has struggled to intercept many of the deadly missiles Moscow fires at its cities on a regular basis.

Earlier in the day, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said Russia had launched nearly 1,000 missiles and drones at Ukraine since the start of the year as Kyiv maintained a missile-threat alert for several regions on January 30, hours after Russian strikes killed at least three civilians.

"Russia has launched over 330 missiles of various types and approximately 600 combat drones at Ukrainian cities since the beginning of the year," Zelenskiy said on X, formerly Twitter.

"To withstand such terrorist pressure, a sufficiently strong air shield is required. And this is the type of air shield we are building with our partners," he wrote.

"Air defense and electronic warfare are our top priorities. Russian terror must be defeated -- this is achievable."

Live Briefing: Russia's Invasion Of Ukraine

RFE/RL's Live Briefing gives you all of the latest developments on Russia's full-scale invasion, Kyiv's counteroffensive, Western military aid, global reaction, and the plight of civilians. For all of RFE/RL's coverage of the war in Ukraine, click here.

A man was killed and his wife was wounded in the Russian shelling early on January 30 in the village of Veletenske in Ukraine's southern Kherson region, the regional prosecutor's office reported.

U.S. lawmakers have been debating for months a supplementary spending bill that includes $61 billion in aid to Ukraine. The aid would allow Ukraine to obtain a variety of U.S. weapons and armaments, including air-defense systems. The $61 billion -- if approved -- would likely cover Ukraine's needs through early 2025, experts have said.

Separately, regional Governor Oleksandr Prokudin said that Russian forces had fired 272 shells at Kherson from across the Dnieper River.

In the eastern region of Donetsk, one civilian was killed and another one was wounded by the Russian bombardment of the settlement of Myrnohrad, Vadym Filashin, the governor of the Ukrainian-controlled part of the region, said on January 30.

Also in Donetsk, in the industrial city of Avdiyivka, Russian shells struck a private house, killing a 47-year-old woman, Filashkin said on Telegram.

Russian forces have been trying to capture Adviyivka for the past several weeks in one of the bloodiest battles of the war triggered by Moscow's unprovoked invasion in February 2022.

Indiscriminate shelling of civilian areas has turned most of Avdiyivka into rubble.

Earlier on January 30, Ukrainian air defenses shot down 15 out of 35 drones launched by Russia, the military said.

The Russian drones targeted the Mykolayiv, Kirovohrad, Dnipropetrovsk, Poltava, and Kharkiv regions, the Ukrainian Air Force said.

Russian forces also launched 10 S-300 anti-aircraft missiles at civilian infrastructure in the Donetsk and Kherson regions, the military said, adding that there dead and wounded among the civilian population.

The Ukrainian Air Force later said that the Kirovohrad, Kharkiv, Donetsk, Dnipropetrovsk, and Zaporizhzhya regions remained under a heightened level of alert due to the danger of more missile strikes.

Meanwhile, Russia's Defense Ministry said its air defenses had destroyed or intercepted 21 Ukrainian drones over the Moscow-occupied Crimean Peninsula and several Russian regions.

On the battlefield, Ukrainian forces fought 70 close-quarters battles along the entire front line, the General Staff of the Ukrainian military said in its daily report early on January 30. Ukrainian defenders repelled repeated Russian attacks in eight hot spots in the east, the military said.

In Washington, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken on January 29 warned that Ukraine's gains over two years of fighting invading Russian troops were all in doubt without new U.S. funding, as NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg visited to lobby Congress.

WATCH: In February 2022, Ukrainian Army medic Yuriy Armash was trying to reach his unit as the Russian invasion was advancing fast. He was caught in Kherson, tortured, and held for months. While in captivity, he used his medical training to treat other Ukrainian prisoners. Some say he saved their lives.

Tens of billions of dollars in aid has been sent to Ukraine since the invasion in February 2022, but Republican lawmakers have grown reluctant to keep supporting Kyiv, saying it lacks a clear end game as the fighting against President Vladimir Putin's forces grinds on.

Blinken offered an increasingly dire picture of Ukraine's prospects without U.S. approval of the so-called supplemental funding amid reports that some progress was being made on the matter late on January 29.

In Brussels, European Union leaders will restate their determination to continue to provide "timely, predictable, and sustainable military support" to Ukraine at a summit on February 1, according to draft conclusions of the meeting.

"The European Council also reiterates the urgent need to accelerate the delivery of ammunition and missiles," the draft text, seen by Reuters, also says.


This content originally appeared on News - Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty and was authored by News - Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/01/30/bulgaria-issues-warrants-for-six-russians-accused-of-destroying-arms-warehouses/feed/ 0 455981
Statement on NSA Buying Americans’ Internet Data Without Warrants https://www.radiofree.org/2024/01/25/statement-on-nsa-buying-americans-internet-data-without-warrants/ https://www.radiofree.org/2024/01/25/statement-on-nsa-buying-americans-internet-data-without-warrants/#respond Thu, 25 Jan 2024 22:51:04 +0000 https://www.commondreams.org/newswire/statement-on-nsa-buying-americans-internet-data-without-warrants The New York Times has just revealed that the NSA is buying Americans' internet records without court orders. The news comes as the House of Representatives debates closing the "data broker loophole," which government agencies increasingly use to avoid court order requirements, in the context of a roiling fight over warrantless surveillance powers set to expire in April.

In response to this reporting from the New York Times, Demand Progress Policy Director Sean Vitka issued the following statement:

"Not only is it outrageous that the NSA is buying Americans' browsing records without court orders—including 'wholly domestic' records—but intelligence officials fought to keep this fact hidden from the public even as Congress is debating surveillance reforms, specifically including the data broker loophole.

"Congress must not reauthorize warrantless surveillance powers like Section 702 of FISA without reforms to stop this massive, systemic invasion of Americans' privacy. Instead, they should swiftly pass the Protect Liberty and End Warrantless Surveillance Act to close the data broker loophole.”

This development comes amid an ongoing, months-long national debate over warrantless surveillance, with the House Judiciary Committee twice passing legislation to prohibit warrantless data broker sales to government agencies on overwhelming, bipartisan bases. Congress is expected to vote on warrantless surveillance practices by April 19 due to the scheduled expiration of a controversial Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act authority known as Section 702.


This content originally appeared on Common Dreams and was authored by Newswire Editor.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2024/01/25/statement-on-nsa-buying-americans-internet-data-without-warrants/feed/ 0 454891
China’s issues warrants for 10 people in Myanmar’s Kokang region https://www.rfa.org/english/news/myanmar/myanmar-china-arrest-warrants-12112023193721.html https://www.rfa.org/english/news/myanmar/myanmar-china-arrest-warrants-12112023193721.html#respond Tue, 12 Dec 2023 00:38:31 +0000 https://www.rfa.org/english/news/myanmar/myanmar-china-arrest-warrants-12112023193721.html China’s Ministry of Public Security has issued arrest warrants for 10 people alleged to have been involved in online scamming businesses in Myanmar’s Kokang Self-Administered Zone in northern Shan state.

Among the 10 was Bai Suocheng, the region’s former leader and a former member of parliament from the pro-military Union Solidarity and Development Party, or USDP. His son, Bai Yingcang, the 31-year-old commander of the Kokang militia, was also named, according to junta-controlled media.

Scamming gangs have proliferated in Shan state, along eastern Myanmar’s borders with China and Thailand, amid the political chaos in the wake of the Feb. 1, 2021, coup d’etat. 

The gangs have benefitted from widespread unemployment and poor oversight. They’re known to brutally punish trafficking victims who refuse to work for them or fail to meet earning quotas, sometimes with deadly consequences.

Chinese Minister of Public Security Wang Xiaohong and junta chief Senior Gen. Min Aung Hlaing met in Naypyidaw on Oct. 31 and agreed to form a joint task force to eradicate online scam rings in Laukkaing, Kokang’s principal township.

ENG_BUR_ChinaWarrants_12112023.2.jpeg
Three hundred and thirty-seven Chinese nationals from Myanmar’s Kokang region were transferred to China on Oct. 7, 2023. (Kokang Region News)

Weeks later, the Chinese government issued a set of warrants for four family members accused of orchestrating telecom scam rings in Myanmar staffed by human trafficking victims.

One of the four was Ming Xuechang, a former member of parliament for the USDP who fatally shot himself after police in Kokang took him into custody. The other three were immediately handed over to Chinese authorities at the border, according to junta-aligned media outlets.

Beijing’s initiative

Earlier in October, authorities in China arrested 11 businesspeople at a trade fair in Yunnan province’s Lincang township, according to Chinese state media. 

Among them was Liu Zhangqi – a hotelier and former USDP lawmaker who is one of Ming Xuechang’s grandsons.

The new warrants indicate that Beijing remains unhappy with the junta’s lack of decisive action against online fraud operations in Kokang, political commentator Than Soe Naing told Radio Free Asia.

“It is difficult to go in and arrest those who are involved in the online fraud because they were parliamentary members of the Union Solidarity and Development Party, which is a political party backed and recognized by the junta,” he said. “That’s why China had to issue the arrest warrants.”

RFA’s calls to junta spokesman Major Gen. Zaw Min Tun regarding the warrants went unanswered on Sunday.

But on Dec. 5, he said through the junta-controlled media that Myanmar won’t allow activities that harm the interests of neighboring countries. He added that Myanmar is actively participating in the crackdown on online fraud businesses.

Translated by Htin Aung Kyaw. Edited by Matt Reed and Malcolm Foster.


This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By RFA Burmese.

]]>
https://www.rfa.org/english/news/myanmar/myanmar-china-arrest-warrants-12112023193721.html/feed/ 0 445092
China’s issues warrants for 10 people in Myanmar’s Kokang region https://www.rfa.org/english/news/myanmar/myanmar-china-arrest-warrants-12112023193721.html https://www.rfa.org/english/news/myanmar/myanmar-china-arrest-warrants-12112023193721.html#respond Tue, 12 Dec 2023 00:38:31 +0000 https://www.rfa.org/english/news/myanmar/myanmar-china-arrest-warrants-12112023193721.html China’s Ministry of Public Security has issued arrest warrants for 10 people alleged to have been involved in online scamming businesses in Myanmar’s Kokang Self-Administered Zone in northern Shan state.

Among the 10 was Bai Suocheng, the region’s former leader and a former member of parliament from the pro-military Union Solidarity and Development Party, or USDP. His son, Bai Yingcang, the 31-year-old commander of the Kokang militia, was also named, according to junta-controlled media.

Scamming gangs have proliferated in Shan state, along eastern Myanmar’s borders with China and Thailand, amid the political chaos in the wake of the Feb. 1, 2021, coup d’etat. 

The gangs have benefitted from widespread unemployment and poor oversight. They’re known to brutally punish trafficking victims who refuse to work for them or fail to meet earning quotas, sometimes with deadly consequences.

Chinese Minister of Public Security Wang Xiaohong and junta chief Senior Gen. Min Aung Hlaing met in Naypyidaw on Oct. 31 and agreed to form a joint task force to eradicate online scam rings in Laukkaing, Kokang’s principal township.

ENG_BUR_ChinaWarrants_12112023.2.jpeg
Three hundred and thirty-seven Chinese nationals from Myanmar’s Kokang region were transferred to China on Oct. 7, 2023. (Kokang Region News)

Weeks later, the Chinese government issued a set of warrants for four family members accused of orchestrating telecom scam rings in Myanmar staffed by human trafficking victims.

One of the four was Ming Xuechang, a former member of parliament for the USDP who fatally shot himself after police in Kokang took him into custody. The other three were immediately handed over to Chinese authorities at the border, according to junta-aligned media outlets.

Beijing’s initiative

Earlier in October, authorities in China arrested 11 businesspeople at a trade fair in Yunnan province’s Lincang township, according to Chinese state media. 

Among them was Liu Zhangqi – a hotelier and former USDP lawmaker who is one of Ming Xuechang’s grandsons.

The new warrants indicate that Beijing remains unhappy with the junta’s lack of decisive action against online fraud operations in Kokang, political commentator Than Soe Naing told Radio Free Asia.

“It is difficult to go in and arrest those who are involved in the online fraud because they were parliamentary members of the Union Solidarity and Development Party, which is a political party backed and recognized by the junta,” he said. “That’s why China had to issue the arrest warrants.”

RFA’s calls to junta spokesman Major Gen. Zaw Min Tun regarding the warrants went unanswered on Sunday.

But on Dec. 5, he said through the junta-controlled media that Myanmar won’t allow activities that harm the interests of neighboring countries. He added that Myanmar is actively participating in the crackdown on online fraud businesses.

Translated by Htin Aung Kyaw. Edited by Matt Reed and Malcolm Foster.


This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By RFA Burmese.

]]>
https://www.rfa.org/english/news/myanmar/myanmar-china-arrest-warrants-12112023193721.html/feed/ 0 445091
PNG deploys armoured vehicles to Enga in action against ‘domestic terrorism’ https://www.radiofree.org/2023/08/29/png-deploys-armoured-vehicles-to-enga-in-action-against-domestic-terrorism/ https://www.radiofree.org/2023/08/29/png-deploys-armoured-vehicles-to-enga-in-action-against-domestic-terrorism/#respond Tue, 29 Aug 2023 03:12:30 +0000 https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=92434

By Theophiles Singh in Port Moresby

Police Commissioner David Manning has warned Papua New Guinea’s security force staff and partners not to let their guard down as hostilities remain simmering in the Highlands with a risk of violent confrontations.

He said that a stronger approach was needed by the security forces against troublemakers, and increased engagement between stakeholders was yielding results.

Deputy Commissioner of Police Operations Phillip Mitna has announced that more than 200 security personnel will be deployed with two armoured vehicles to curb a recent spike of killings and tribal fighting in Enga province.

The deployment will consist of more than 120 PNG Defence Force soldiers who are already on the ground, with an additional two Mobile Squad units who are on standby to be deployed soon.

Deputy Commissioner Mitna also announced that the Police Commissioner had given the green light to establish a Special Police Unit, similar to the Airborne Tactical Unit (ATU), which would be dedicated solely towards dealing with domestic terrorism in the country.

“The commissioner has announced the formation of the Kumul 23 Police tactical unit, but further details will be revealed later on,” he said.

“They will report directly to the Commissioner of Police.

Rapid deployment unit
“This will be a rapid deployment unit, tasked to respond to violent crimes like domestic terrorism and domestic threats,” he said.

“The unit will be spearheaded by the Police but we will have support from the Defence Force as well. “We hope to increase its numbers as high as 1000 personnel.”

He said multiple search warrants had also been issued to apprehend several hired gunmen and their accomplices.

This included sponsors and connections who were supplying arms and funding tribal warfare in the province.

“Search warrants have been issued, some have been executed and some are yet to be executed.

“We are taking a proactive and reactive approach to the situation,” he said.

“We have information on several leaders ‘in general’ being involved and are currently working on issuing search warrants.

Pending approval
“Some of these warrants are pending approval from the court magistrates.”

Deputy Commissioner Mitna said the police would not stop until these instigators of violence faced justice.

He explained that drastic measures had been taken to promptly and safely ensure law and order was returned to normal as the Lagaip Open byelection was approaching.

The priority areas include Wapenamanda, Lagaip and Porgera.

“As part of our proactive strategy, we will be deploying Engan-based senior Police officers from NCD back to the province so that they can talk to their own people,” Deputy Commissioner Mitna said.

But this approach needed the support of the wider community, including business houses, church groups and community leaders who would provide additional support to settle the situation.

Intel officers
“Our reactive approach will include our intel officers, who will move on the ground to conduct investigations into identifying those involved to arrest and prosecute them,” he said.

He said the public was advised not to believe everything that had been spread on social media because most of what was shared online was false and inaccurate.

“We have both Wapenamanda and Pogera contained, but we have isolated cases of particularly several hired gunmen being killed,” Deputy Commissioner Mitna said.

“Other than that, we are stepping up operations and the entire area is currently under our microscope,” he said.

Deputy Commissioner Mitna said that rival factions were using “hit and run” and “guerrilla type” warfare, obstructing police from identifying and arresting perpetrators.

Theophiles Singh is a PNG Post-Courier journalist. Republished with permission.

 

 

 


This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by APR editor.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2023/08/29/png-deploys-armoured-vehicles-to-enga-in-action-against-domestic-terrorism/feed/ 0 423417
Hong Kong warrants spark fears of widening ‘long-arm’ political enforcement by China https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/hong-kong-warrants-07042023172805.html https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/hong-kong-warrants-07042023172805.html#respond Tue, 04 Jul 2023 21:28:18 +0000 https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/hong-kong-warrants-07042023172805.html Concerns are growing that China could start using the Interpol "red notice" arrest warrant system to target anyone overseas, of any nationality, who says or does something the ruling Communist Party doesn't like, using Hong Kong's three-year-old national security law.

Dozens of rights groups on Tuesday called on governments to suspend any remaining extradition treaties with China and Hong Kong after the city's government issued arrest warrants and bounties for eight prominent figures in the overseas democracy movement on Monday, vowing to pursue them for the rest of their lives.

"We urge governments to suspend the remaining extradition treaties that exist between democracies and the Hong Kong and Chinese governments and work towards coordinating an Interpol early warning system to protect Hong Kongers and other dissidents abroad," an open letter dated July 4 and signed by more than 50 Hong Kong-linked civil society groups around the world said.

"Hong Kong activists in exile must be protected in their peaceful fight for basic human rights, freedoms and democracy," said the letter, which was signed by dozens of local Hong Kong exile groups from around the world, as well as by Human Rights in China and the World Uyghur Congress.

Hong Kong's national security law, according to its own Article 38, applies anywhere in the world, to people of all nationalities.

The warrants came days after the Beijing-backed Ta Kung Pao newspaper said Interpol red notices could be used to pursue people "who do not have permanent resident status of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and commit crimes against Hong Kong outside Hong Kong." 

"If the Hong Kong [government] wants to extradite foreign criminals back to Hong Kong for trial, [it] must formally notify the relevant countries and request that local law enforcement agencies arrest the fugitives and send them back to Hong Kong for trial," the paper said.

While Interpol's red notice system isn't designed for political arrests, China has built close ties and influence with the international body in recent years, with its former security minister Meng Hongwei rising to become president prior to his sudden arrest and prosecution in 2019, and another former top Chinese cop elected to the board in 2021.

And there are signs that Hong Kong's national security police are already starting to target overseas citizens carrying out activities seen as hostile to China on foreign soil.

Hong Kong police in March wrote to the London-based rights group Hong Kong Watch ordering it to take down its website.

And people of Chinese descent who are citizens of other countries have already been targeted by Beijing for "national security" related charges.

Call to ignore

To address a growing sense of insecurity among overseas rights advocates concerned with Hong Kong, the letter called on authorities in the United Kingdom, United States of America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Europe to reiterate that the Hong Kong National Security Law does not apply in their jurisdictions, and to reaffirm that the Hong Kong arrest warrants won't be recognized.

The New York-based Human Rights Watch said the "unlawful activities" the eight are accused of should all be protected under human rights guarantees in Hong Kong's mini-constitution, the Basic Law.

ENG_CHN_HKNatSec_07042023.2.jpg
Hong Kong police on Monday, July 3, 2023, issued arrest warrants and offered bounties for eight activists and former lawmakers who have fled the city. They are [clockwise from top left] Kevin Yam, Elmer Yuen, Anna Kwok, Dennis Kwok, Nathan Law, Finn Lau, Mung Siu-tat and Ted Hui. Credit: Screenshot from Reuters video

"In recent years, the Chinese government has expanded efforts to control information and intimidate activists around the world by manipulation of bodies such as Interpol," it said in a statement, adding that more than 100,000 Hong Kongers have fled the city since the crackdown on dissent began.

"The Hong Kong government’s charges and bounties against eight Hong Kong people in exile reflects the growing importance of the diaspora’s political activism,” Maya Wang, associate director in the group's Asia division, said in a statement.

"Foreign governments should not only publicly reject cooperating with National Security Law cases, but should take concrete actions to hold top Beijing and Hong Kong officials accountable," she said.

Hong Kong’s Chief Executive John Lee told reporters on Tuesday that the only way for the activists to “end their destiny of being an abscondee who will be pursued for life is to surrender” and urged them “to give themselves up as soon as possible”.

The Communist Party-backed Wen Wei Po newspaper cited Yiu Chi Shing, who represents Hong Kong on the standing committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, as saying that those who have fled overseas will continue to oppose the government from wherever they are.

"Anyone who crosses the red lines in the national security law will be punished, no matter how far away," Yiu told the paper.

The rights groups warned that Monday's arrest warrants represent a significant escalation in "long-arm" law enforcement by authorities in Beijing and Hong Kong.

Extradition

While the U.S., U.K. and several other countries suspended their extradition agreements with Hong Kong after the national security law criminalized public dissent and criticism of the authorities from July 1, 2020, several countries still have extradition arrangements in force, including the Philippines, Portugal, Singapore, South Africa and Sri Lanka.

South Korea, Malaysia, India and Indonesia could also still allow extradition to Hong Kong, according to a Wikipedia article on the topic.

Meanwhile, several European countries have extradition agreements in place with China, including Belgium, Italy and France, while others have sent fugitives to China at the request of its police.

However, a landmark ruling by the European Court of Human Rights in October 2022 could mean an end to extraditions to China among 46 signatories to the European Convention on Human Rights.

"The eight [on the wanted list] should be safe for now, but if they were to travel overseas and arrive in a country that has an extradition agreement with either mainland China or Hong Kong, then they could be arrested on request," researcher Wang Hsin-li of Taiwan's Association of Strategic Foresight said.

ENG_CHN_HKNatSec_07042023.3.jpg
Hong Kong’s Chief Executive John Lee on Tuesday urged the eight Hong Kong activists who are sought under arrest warrants “to give themselves up as soon as possible.” Credit: Peter Parks/AFP

But he said he doesn't believe that the government in China or Hong Kong cares much about the international outcry in response to the warrants, which have included growing calls for Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee to be barred from entering the United States to attend the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in San Francisco in November.

"They're pretty indifferent to international calls for sanctions," Wang said. "Their thinking now is that national security trumps everything else."

UK ‘strongly objects’

Lawyer and current affairs commentator Sang Pu agreed that officials could start using Interpol red notices, adding that the purpose of such international pressure seems to be to stop people from speaking up or protesting against the Chinese Communist Party overseas.

"This wasn't aimed at those eight in particular, but at many more like them who are engaged in human rights advocacy and community building work," Sang said of the Hong Kong warrants.

"There are many people like that in Taiwan, Britain, the United States, Canada and Australia."

British Foreign Secretary James Cleverley said his government "strongly objects" to the national security law.

"The decision to issue arrest warrants for 8 activists, some of whom are in the UK, is a further example of the authoritarian reach of China’s extraterritorial law," Cleverley said via Twitter, echoing earlier objections from the State Department.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said such criticisms were "flagrant slander," and said the eight activists were "acting as pawns for anti-China forces overseas."

"Relevant countries need to respect China’s sovereignty and the rule of law in Hong Kong, stop lending support for anti-China elements destabilizing Hong Kong, and stop providing a safe haven for fugitives," she told a regular news conference in Beijing.

British Security Minister Tom Tugendhat said the warrants were "trying to interfere with our internal affairs."

"Nathan Law and his fellow pro-democracy activists are under our protection, and enjoy our full support," he said via Twitter in response to the arrest warrants.

Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Malcolm Foster.


This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Gao Feng for RFA Mandarin.

]]>
https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/hong-kong-warrants-07042023172805.html/feed/ 0 409386
Hong Kong warrants spark fears of widening ‘long-arm’ political enforcement by China https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/hong-kong-warrants-07042023172805.html https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/hong-kong-warrants-07042023172805.html#respond Tue, 04 Jul 2023 21:28:18 +0000 https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/hong-kong-warrants-07042023172805.html Concerns are growing that China could start using the Interpol "red notice" arrest warrant system to target anyone overseas, of any nationality, who says or does something the ruling Communist Party doesn't like, using Hong Kong's three-year-old national security law.

Dozens of rights groups on Tuesday called on governments to suspend any remaining extradition treaties with China and Hong Kong after the city's government issued arrest warrants and bounties for eight prominent figures in the overseas democracy movement on Monday, vowing to pursue them for the rest of their lives.

"We urge governments to suspend the remaining extradition treaties that exist between democracies and the Hong Kong and Chinese governments and work towards coordinating an Interpol early warning system to protect Hong Kongers and other dissidents abroad," an open letter dated July 4 and signed by more than 50 Hong Kong-linked civil society groups around the world said.

"Hong Kong activists in exile must be protected in their peaceful fight for basic human rights, freedoms and democracy," said the letter, which was signed by dozens of local Hong Kong exile groups from around the world, as well as by Human Rights in China and the World Uyghur Congress.

Hong Kong's national security law, according to its own Article 38, applies anywhere in the world, to people of all nationalities.

The warrants came days after the Beijing-backed Ta Kung Pao newspaper said Interpol red notices could be used to pursue people "who do not have permanent resident status of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and commit crimes against Hong Kong outside Hong Kong." 

"If the Hong Kong [government] wants to extradite foreign criminals back to Hong Kong for trial, [it] must formally notify the relevant countries and request that local law enforcement agencies arrest the fugitives and send them back to Hong Kong for trial," the paper said.

While Interpol's red notice system isn't designed for political arrests, China has built close ties and influence with the international body in recent years, with its former security minister Meng Hongwei rising to become president prior to his sudden arrest and prosecution in 2019, and another former top Chinese cop elected to the board in 2021.

And there are signs that Hong Kong's national security police are already starting to target overseas citizens carrying out activities seen as hostile to China on foreign soil.

Hong Kong police in March wrote to the London-based rights group Hong Kong Watch ordering it to take down its website.

And people of Chinese descent who are citizens of other countries have already been targeted by Beijing for "national security" related charges.

Call to ignore

To address a growing sense of insecurity among overseas rights advocates concerned with Hong Kong, the letter called on authorities in the United Kingdom, United States of America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Europe to reiterate that the Hong Kong National Security Law does not apply in their jurisdictions, and to reaffirm that the Hong Kong arrest warrants won't be recognized.

The New York-based Human Rights Watch said the "unlawful activities" the eight are accused of should all be protected under human rights guarantees in Hong Kong's mini-constitution, the Basic Law.

ENG_CHN_HKNatSec_07042023.2.jpg
Hong Kong police on Monday, July 3, 2023, issued arrest warrants and offered bounties for eight activists and former lawmakers who have fled the city. They are [clockwise from top left] Kevin Yam, Elmer Yuen, Anna Kwok, Dennis Kwok, Nathan Law, Finn Lau, Mung Siu-tat and Ted Hui. Credit: Screenshot from Reuters video

"In recent years, the Chinese government has expanded efforts to control information and intimidate activists around the world by manipulation of bodies such as Interpol," it said in a statement, adding that more than 100,000 Hong Kongers have fled the city since the crackdown on dissent began.

"The Hong Kong government’s charges and bounties against eight Hong Kong people in exile reflects the growing importance of the diaspora’s political activism,” Maya Wang, associate director in the group's Asia division, said in a statement.

"Foreign governments should not only publicly reject cooperating with National Security Law cases, but should take concrete actions to hold top Beijing and Hong Kong officials accountable," she said.

Hong Kong’s Chief Executive John Lee told reporters on Tuesday that the only way for the activists to “end their destiny of being an abscondee who will be pursued for life is to surrender” and urged them “to give themselves up as soon as possible”.

The Communist Party-backed Wen Wei Po newspaper cited Yiu Chi Shing, who represents Hong Kong on the standing committee of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, as saying that those who have fled overseas will continue to oppose the government from wherever they are.

"Anyone who crosses the red lines in the national security law will be punished, no matter how far away," Yiu told the paper.

The rights groups warned that Monday's arrest warrants represent a significant escalation in "long-arm" law enforcement by authorities in Beijing and Hong Kong.

Extradition

While the U.S., U.K. and several other countries suspended their extradition agreements with Hong Kong after the national security law criminalized public dissent and criticism of the authorities from July 1, 2020, several countries still have extradition arrangements in force, including the Philippines, Portugal, Singapore, South Africa and Sri Lanka.

South Korea, Malaysia, India and Indonesia could also still allow extradition to Hong Kong, according to a Wikipedia article on the topic.

Meanwhile, several European countries have extradition agreements in place with China, including Belgium, Italy and France, while others have sent fugitives to China at the request of its police.

However, a landmark ruling by the European Court of Human Rights in October 2022 could mean an end to extraditions to China among 46 signatories to the European Convention on Human Rights.

"The eight [on the wanted list] should be safe for now, but if they were to travel overseas and arrive in a country that has an extradition agreement with either mainland China or Hong Kong, then they could be arrested on request," researcher Wang Hsin-li of Taiwan's Association of Strategic Foresight said.

ENG_CHN_HKNatSec_07042023.3.jpg
Hong Kong’s Chief Executive John Lee on Tuesday urged the eight Hong Kong activists who are sought under arrest warrants “to give themselves up as soon as possible.” Credit: Peter Parks/AFP

But he said he doesn't believe that the government in China or Hong Kong cares much about the international outcry in response to the warrants, which have included growing calls for Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee to be barred from entering the United States to attend the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in San Francisco in November.

"They're pretty indifferent to international calls for sanctions," Wang said. "Their thinking now is that national security trumps everything else."

UK ‘strongly objects’

Lawyer and current affairs commentator Sang Pu agreed that officials could start using Interpol red notices, adding that the purpose of such international pressure seems to be to stop people from speaking up or protesting against the Chinese Communist Party overseas.

"This wasn't aimed at those eight in particular, but at many more like them who are engaged in human rights advocacy and community building work," Sang said of the Hong Kong warrants.

"There are many people like that in Taiwan, Britain, the United States, Canada and Australia."

British Foreign Secretary James Cleverley said his government "strongly objects" to the national security law.

"The decision to issue arrest warrants for 8 activists, some of whom are in the UK, is a further example of the authoritarian reach of China’s extraterritorial law," Cleverley said via Twitter, echoing earlier objections from the State Department.

Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said such criticisms were "flagrant slander," and said the eight activists were "acting as pawns for anti-China forces overseas."

"Relevant countries need to respect China’s sovereignty and the rule of law in Hong Kong, stop lending support for anti-China elements destabilizing Hong Kong, and stop providing a safe haven for fugitives," she told a regular news conference in Beijing.

British Security Minister Tom Tugendhat said the warrants were "trying to interfere with our internal affairs."

"Nathan Law and his fellow pro-democracy activists are under our protection, and enjoy our full support," he said via Twitter in response to the arrest warrants.

Translated by Luisetta Mudie. Edited by Malcolm Foster.


This content originally appeared on Radio Free Asia and was authored by By Gao Feng for RFA Mandarin.

]]>
https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/hong-kong-warrants-07042023172805.html/feed/ 0 409385
ProPublica Partner Sues Mississippi County for Blocking Access to Search Warrants https://www.radiofree.org/2023/05/22/propublica-partner-sues-mississippi-county-for-blocking-access-to-search-warrants/ https://www.radiofree.org/2023/05/22/propublica-partner-sues-mississippi-county-for-blocking-access-to-search-warrants/#respond Mon, 22 May 2023 10:00:00 +0000 https://www.propublica.org/article/daily-journal-sues-union-county-mississippi-blocking-search-warrant-access by Caleb Bedillion, Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal

This article was produced for ProPublica’s Local Reporting Network in partnership with Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal. Sign up for Dispatches to get stories like this one as soon as they are published.

The Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal has sued Mississippi’s Union County, asking a judge to order that search warrants in its county-level justice court be made open for public inspection.

The lawsuit comes after an investigation last year by the Daily Journal and ProPublica found that almost two-thirds of Mississippi’s justice courts obstruct access to search warrants and to the affidavits used by police to obtain them.

That thwarts public scrutiny of searches, including no-knock raids in which police sometimes enter people’s homes at night with guns drawn. Last year, two Mississippi counties settled lawsuits involving such raids in which police shot people, one fatally.

Law enforcement usually must get permission from a judge before searching someone’s property, and normally they must knock and announce themselves before entering. But they can ask a judge for a no-knock warrant if they provide specific reasons.

They must bring search warrants back to court after a search, along with a list of what they seized.

The news organizations found that some Mississippi courts break statewide rules that require clerks to keep those warrants on file. Other courts — such as the Union County Justice Court — have the documents but claim the public can’t look at them.

“Our goal is to ensure that judicial records are kept open and that the government at all levels does its work where the public can see it,” Daily Journal Executive Editor Sam Hall said. “It seems clear to us — and to many other courts across the country — that the records we’ve requested should be public.”

The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized a centuries-old norm that court proceedings and papers should be open to the public. Judges can order that certain documents be sealed, but that must be done on a case-by-case basis.

Federal appeals courts have agreed that search warrants are judicial records that should be open to inspection, though they disagree about when exactly the document becomes subject to access.

It is “highly unusual” for a court to claim “that search warrants and related materials are simply never accessible to the public,” Katie Townsend, deputy executive director and legal director for the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, told the news organizations last year.

But many of Mississippi’s justice courts, which frequently handle search warrants, did just that.

An attorney acting on behalf of Union County told the Daily Journal that records of executed search warrants on file with the clerk of the Union County Justice Court are shielded from public view because of a state law that protects the investigative records of law enforcement agencies.

In its lawsuit, the Daily Journal argues that this claim runs afoul of Mississippi’s Public Records Act and the common-law right to access court records. Mississippi’s public records law does contain an exemption for certain investigative records, but the exemption applies only to law enforcement agencies, not courts.

The county later offered to make some search warrants available, but only if a criminal investigation had concluded and a judge gave permission. The Daily Journal’s lawsuit argues that these conditions aren’t supported by law.

A representative of Union County did not respond to a request for comment on the lawsuit.

Experts say it’s not easy to get access to search warrants in many courthouses across the country. Even so, they said the problems with record-keeping and public access in Mississippi’s justice courts were extreme.

After a search warrant has been executed, it “should be a part of the files and available for public inspection,” William Waller Jr., a retired chief justice of Mississippi’s Supreme Court, told the news organizations last year. He helped draft the state’s rules of criminal procedure.

In response to the Daily Journal and ProPublica’s investigation, Mississippi’s judicial training body has advised court clerks and judges at training sessions that executed search warrants must be kept on file by the clerk and that the documents should be considered public if a judge hasn’t sealed them.

Last month, an insurance program run by many Mississippi counties held a risk management conference for law enforcement agencies, featuring sessions on search warrants and no-knock raids. Lawyers warned sheriffs that deputies should carefully document their reasons for conducting no-knock searches.

Rural Monroe County, in Mississippi’s northeast corner, settled a lawsuit for $690,000 last year over a 2015 fatal shooting by sheriff’s deputies during a 1 a.m. raid to look for drugs. Ricky Keeton came to the door with an air pistol as deputies pried open his door. His girlfriend said he thought someone was breaking in.

Also last year, Coahoma County, in the Mississippi Delta, settled a lawsuit that involved a 2020 raid in which sheriff’s deputies shot an unarmed man multiple times. He wasn’t even the target of the search and only happened to be at the house at the time of the raid. The amount of the settlement has not been disclosed.


This content originally appeared on Articles and Investigations - ProPublica and was authored by by Caleb Bedillion, Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2023/05/22/propublica-partner-sues-mississippi-county-for-blocking-access-to-search-warrants/feed/ 0 396638
Brazil Issues Arrest Warrants for Top Bolsonaro Aides as Nation Braces for More Right-Wing Violence https://www.radiofree.org/2023/01/11/brazil-issues-arrest-warrants-for-top-bolsonaro-aides-as-nation-braces-for-more-right-wing-violence/ https://www.radiofree.org/2023/01/11/brazil-issues-arrest-warrants-for-top-bolsonaro-aides-as-nation-braces-for-more-right-wing-violence/#respond Wed, 11 Jan 2023 18:11:24 +0000 https://www.commondreams.org/news/brazil-arrest-warrants-bolsonaro-aides

Brazilian authorities on Tuesday issued arrest warrants for a pair of government security officials, focused attention on people accused of bankrolling Sunday's anti-democratic assault, and asked a federal court to freeze the assets of far-right former President Jair Bolsonaro, who remains in Florida—escalating the crackdown on suspected participants in and supporters of the January 8 coup attempt against recently inaugurated leftist President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.

"The moves showed that, a day after arresting hundreds of people suspected of taking part in Sunday’s riot in Brazil's capital, Brasília, the nation's top officials have now turned their focus to the political and business elites suspected of inspiring, organizing, or aiding the rioters," The New York Timesreported.

In response to requests from the federal police, Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes issued warrants for Anderson Torres—a Bolsonaro ally who served as the ex-president's justice minister from 2021 to 2022 before reprising his previous position as security chief of the Federal District, a small province that includes Brasília, on January 2—and Federal District police chief Fabio Augusto Vieira.

"Brazilian democracy will not be struck, much less destroyed, by terrorist criminals," Moraes wrote in his decision.

The judge's intervention came after thousands of democracy defenders took to the streets of Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo on Monday night to demand jail time for insurrectionists and those who aided and abetted their attack. It also came as Lula's government braces for the potential of more anti-democratic violence on Wednesday, with pro-Bolsonaro social media accounts calling for mass demonstrations to "retake power."

In preparation, Reutersreported Wednesday, Moraes "issued a ban on roadblocks that have been used by anti-government demonstrators to create economic disruption and ordered local authorities to prevent the storming of public buildings."

When election-denying Bolsonaristas ransacked Brazil's presidential palace, Congress, and Supreme Court in Brasília on Sunday, Torres, the person tasked with keeping the city safe, "was a continent away in Florida—the same state his ex-boss... had relocated to after losing last year's election," Reuters noted.

The right-wing mob invaded Brazil's main government buildings under the false pretense that Bolsonaro's loss in October's election was the result of widespread fraud—a mistaken belief fueled by years of Bolsonaro and his allies' baseless attacks on the integrity of the country's election infrastructure, disinformation that spread rapidly on social media.

Torres played a key role in promoting Bolsonaro's officially debunked lies about the rigging of electronic voting machines. During his stint as justice minister, Torres also tapped Silvinei Vasques, an ardent Bolsonaro backer, to head the federal highway police. Vasques was charged in November and dismissed last month for suppressing the vote by authorizing road blockades in northeastern Brazil, a heavily pro-Lula region, during the election.

Torres lasted less than a week in his new role as Brasília's security chief. As Reuters noted, "Ibaneis Rocha, the governor of the Federal District, sacked Torres amid the chaos on Sunday afternoon, just hours before a Supreme Court order suspended Rocha from office for 90 days."

Ricardo Cappelli, appointed by Lula to lead the federal government's post-invasion takeover of Brasília's public security, toldCNN Brasil that Sunday's attack "was a structured sabotage operation, commanded by Bolsonaro's ex-minister Anderson Torres."

"Torres took over as secretary for security (in Brasília), dismissed the whole chain of command, and then took a trip," said Cappelli. "If that's not sabotage, I don't know what is."

According to Moraes, who is also Brazil's elections chief, investigators have "evidence that the officials knew violence was brewing but did nothing to stop it," the Times reported. "He said that they were under investigation for terrorism, criminal association, and offenses related to the violent overthrow of democracy."

Brazil's solicitor general also issued a request for Torres' arrest, and another top federal prosecutor asked to freeze the assets of Torres and Rocha.

Torres said Tuesday on social media that he would cut his vacation short and return to Brazil to defend himself, tweeting: “I have always guided my actions with ethics and legality. I believe in the Brazilian justice system and in the strength of the institutions. I am certain that the truth will prevail."

Also on Tuesday, "a top public prosecutor asked a federal court to freeze the assets of Mr. Bolsonaro in relation to the investigation into the riots," the Times reported. The request "is now in the hands of a judge, but it is unclear whether the court has the legal power to block his accounts. And freezing assets, even if it were not challenged in court, could prove a lengthy and complex process."

In addition, authorities are "expected to take action against more than 100 companies thought to have helped the protesters, including many believed to have transported rioters to the capital or to have provided them with free food and shelter," the newspaper noted.

Per the Times:

Brazil's new justice minister, Flávio Dino, said government investigators had zeroed in on companies in at least 10 states that were suspected of having helped finance the riots. Authorities were seeking arrest warrants for "people who did not come to Brasília, but who participated in the crime, who are organizers, financiers," Mr. Dino said on Tuesday.

Both Mr. Dino and President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva have said that they believe prominent players in the country’s powerful agriculture industry, which largely backed Mr. Bolsonaro in the election, played a role.

"These people were there today, the agribusiness," Mr. Lula said after the attacks, adding that "all these people will be investigated, found out, and will be punished."

Many Bolsonaristas spent weeks after the October 30 runoff calling for the armed forces to intervene to keep Bolsonaro—a vocal admirer of Brazil's former U.S.-backed military dictatorship, in which he served as an army officer—in power.

Bolsonaro, meanwhile, decamped to Orlando two days before Lula's January 1 inauguration. Numerous Democratic lawmakers have called on the U.S. to stop providing refuge to Brazil's former president in Florida.

Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), head of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee's Western Hemisphere panel, said Tuesday that the U.S. should comply if Lula's administration requests Bolsonaro's extradition.


This content originally appeared on Common Dreams and was authored by Kenny Stancil.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2023/01/11/brazil-issues-arrest-warrants-for-top-bolsonaro-aides-as-nation-braces-for-more-right-wing-violence/feed/ 0 363934
Complaint Filed Against Mississippi Judge for Failing to Hand Over Search Warrants to Clerk https://www.radiofree.org/2022/11/18/complaint-filed-against-mississippi-judge-for-failing-to-hand-over-search-warrants-to-clerk/ https://www.radiofree.org/2022/11/18/complaint-filed-against-mississippi-judge-for-failing-to-hand-over-search-warrants-to-clerk/#respond Fri, 18 Nov 2022 17:20:00 +0000 https://www.propublica.org/article/no-knock-warrants-mississippi-judge-complaint by Caleb Bedillion, Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal

This article was produced for ProPublica’s Local Reporting Network in partnership with the Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal. Sign up for Dispatches to get stories like this one as soon as they are published.

The Mississippi head of a legal advocacy organization has filed a formal complaint with the state judicial commission against a municipal judge whose no-knock search warrants have been challenged in court.

Cliff Johnson of the Mississippi office of the MacArthur Justice Center said he filed the complaint with the state Commission on Judicial Performance to push the state Supreme Court to clarify that judges must hand all search warrants they sign over to local court clerks.

Greenville Municipal Judge Michael Prewitt signed a number of no-knock search warrants that have been challenged in court. Those warrants allow police to barge into someone’s home unannounced. Rather than turn search warrants that he signs over to the clerk, he keeps them. Key legal figures in the state say that violates court rules.

In a statement released before he filed the complaint on Tuesday, Johnson said Prewitt’s handling of search warrants violates Mississippi’s rules of criminal procedure, thwarts public scrutiny and prevents people charged with crimes from defending themselves during the early phase of proceedings.

“It is our hope that the filing of this Judicial Performance complaint will result in the Mississippi Supreme Court sending an explicit reminder to Judge Prewitt and other judges across the state that they are responsible for making sure court files are complete,” Johnson said in the statement.

The complaint follows an investigation by the Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal and ProPublica, which reported that search warrants, including no-knock warrants, are missing from some of the state’s largest municipal courts and many county-level justice courts.

The Daily Journal and ProPublica found that about a third of the state’s 82 county-level justice courts are breaking rules that require them to keep all search warrant records. So are municipal courts in at least five of the state’s 10 largest cities, including Greenville and Jackson, the capital.

Even if the commission substantiates Johnson’s complaint, it could choose to admonish Prewitt privately. Sanctions beyond that, including a suspension, fines or a public reprimand, would require action by the Mississippi Supreme Court.

Hundreds of complaints are filed each year. Since 2010, the Mississippi Supreme Court has sanctioned judges about 50 times following a commission investigation. Many other complaints have resulted in private action.

Johnson declined to provide a copy of the complaint because of confidentiality rules governing complaints before the commission.

Prewitt said Tuesday that he had not yet been notified of a complaint against him. “I’ll be happy to review it and respond to it and go from there,” he said.

In a criminal appeal pending before the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, public defender Merrill Nordstrom argues that Prewitt improperly authorized a no-knock search warrant in 2019 after a police informant purchased less than a gram of marijuana from a Greenville man named Antoine Bryant.

Police burst into Bryant’s home early one morning while his children slept. Bryant’s girlfriend alleged that she received a minor injury during the raid.

Nordstrom argues that the evidence seized in the raid should be thrown out because Prewitt had a pattern of approving no-knock search warrants that failed to pass legal muster. However, she wasn’t able to find most of the search warrants Prewitt had signed because they weren’t at the courthouse.

Her motion to suppress the evidence was denied by a federal judge, as were other challenges to Prewitt’s search warrants that were reviewed by the news organizations.

Prewitt told the Daily Journal and ProPublica this year that he keeps search warrants at his law office. Municipal Court Clerk Priscilla Bush said at the time she was unaware he had them.

On Tuesday, Prewitt said he still doesn’t give warrants to the clerk. Citing the complaint now pending against him, he wouldn’t discuss whether he plans to change that.

The news organizations found that 15 justice courts have no search warrants and 16 have only some.

Some justice and municipal courts fail to require law enforcement to return search warrants and related documents, including inventories of what they seized. Others keep search warrant records but won’t let the public see them, defying well-established jurisprudence about the availability of court records.

Exactly how many warrants are missing from clerks’ offices is unknown because they often don’t know when judges sign warrants or when they are executed.

Experts say the failure to allow access to court records prevents oversight of no-knock raids, which have faced increased scrutiny since Louisville, Kentucky, police shot and killed Breonna Taylor in a 2020 no-knock raid.

In previous comments to the Daily Journal and ProPublica, Prewitt argued that his handling of search warrants complies with the rules of criminal procedure, and if not, the Mississippi Supreme Court should clarify its rules.

Johnson’s complaint against Prewitt argues otherwise, and he wants a definitive statement saying so. Johnson has won key legal victories in Mississippi that prevented cities and counties from jailing poor people for their inability to pay fines and fees.

Mississippi’s rules of criminal procedure, set down by the state Supreme Court, require that search warrants and some other related documents be returned to the court. Those rules don’t specify who should receive the documents. But they do say the court clerk is custodian of all court records, and they require that judges turn over to the clerk any documents filed with them.

Several key legal figures who were involved in the drafting of Mississippi’s rules of criminal procedure agreed that judges should provide executed search warrants to the clerk and the court.

“The judge can’t keep it,” said William Waller Jr., a retired state Supreme Court justice. “That’s what the clerk is there for.”


This content originally appeared on Articles and Investigations - ProPublica and was authored by by Caleb Bedillion, Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2022/11/18/complaint-filed-against-mississippi-judge-for-failing-to-hand-over-search-warrants-to-clerk/feed/ 0 351977
Mississippi’s Missing Search Warrants Prevent Scrutiny of No-Knock Raids https://www.radiofree.org/2022/10/04/mississippis-missing-search-warrants-prevent-scrutiny-of-no-knock-raids/ https://www.radiofree.org/2022/10/04/mississippis-missing-search-warrants-prevent-scrutiny-of-no-knock-raids/#respond Tue, 04 Oct 2022 09:00:00 +0000 https://www.propublica.org/article/no-knock-warrants-missing-mississippi#1454984 by Caleb Bedillion, Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal

This article was produced for ProPublica’s Local Reporting Network in partnership with the Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal. Sign up for Dispatches to get stories like this one as soon as they are published.

Public defender Merrill Nordstrom walked into a Mississippi federal courtroom in May 2021 ready to challenge the no-knock search warrant behind her client’s arrest.

It had happened two years earlier, after an informant bought less than a gram of marijuana from Antoine Bryant. Police broke open Bryant’s door with a battering ram, shattering the glass. Three children sleeping inside were startled awake.

Police found no cache of drugs, but they did find a pistol Bryant wasn’t supposed to have.

By the time Nordstrom asked a judge to toss out the evidence against Bryant, a year had passed since the fatal police shooting of Breonna Taylor during a no-knock raid in Louisville, Kentucky. Taylor’s death and the tactic that led to it had caused widespread outrage.

It was time, Nordstrom said, for similar scrutiny of how these warrants were used in Greenville, the Mississippi Delta’s largest city.

She had learned that most search warrants issued in Greenville were no-knock warrants, which allow law enforcement to barge into someone’s home unannounced. She suspected that many of those raids violated the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches.

“When I saw that they had orchestrated a confidential informant to purchase $10 worth of marijuana, and based on that went and asked for a no-knock search warrant — that, to me, was really egregious,” Nordstrom said. “That’s not what the Fourth Amendment is for. That’s not what our government is supposed to do.”

She faced a major obstacle. Though she had the search warrant for Bryant’s home, she couldn’t find records for most other raids in the city. The search warrants and supporting documents weren’t at the courthouse, even though the state Supreme Court’s rules require law enforcement to return warrants to the court.

Instead they were at the Greenville Police Department, hidden from view because law enforcement agencies, unlike the courts, can claim a broad public records exemption over records in their possession.

Greenville isn’t the only place in Mississippi where many search warrant records are inappropriately off-limits to the public. An investigation by the Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal and ProPublica has found that almost two-thirds of Mississippi’s county-level justice courts prevent access to some or all search warrants and related documents. So do municipal courts in at least five of the state’s 10 largest cities, including Jackson, the capital.

Justice courts handle misdemeanor crimes, small civil cases and, often, search warrants. The judges who preside over these courtrooms are similar to justices of the peace in other states and are not required to have a law degree.

Some of those courts violate state rules by failing to require law enforcement to return search warrants and related documents. Other courts do keep search warrant records but won’t let the public see them, defying well-established jurisprudence about the availability of court records.

The independence and integrity of the judicial branch of government requires openness, said William Waller Jr., a retired chief justice of the Mississippi Supreme Court.

“You should have transparency,” said Waller, who helped write the rules of criminal procedure that some courts are violating. “After it’s been executed, the search warrant should be returned to a judicial officer and that should be a part of the files and available for public inspection.”

On the Trail of No-Knock Search Warrants in Mississippi A no-knock search warrant allows police to enter someone’s home unannounced to conduct a search, even if they have to break down the door. Here’s what happens in Mississippi. First, law enforcement must go before a judge to justify why they want to search the property and why they’re asking for a no-knock warrant. After searching the property, the police must bring the warrant and a list of what they took back to the judge. The warrants are supposed to be stored by the court. But that doesn’t always happen. In some counties, law enforcement keeps the search warrants. That’s against the rules. Some courts have incomplete records. That’s against the rules, too. Other clerks claim that search warrants are off-limits to the public. These practices all block access to information about no-knock raids. (Illustrations by Anuj Shrestha, special to ProPublica)

The U.S. Supreme Court has long recognized the public’s right to view court records, though it hasn’t ruled on the accessibility of search warrants in particular. Although federal appeals courts agree the public generally can view search warrants at some point in the legal process, they disagree on when those records become public. Because of those differing rulings, plus poor record-keeping and orders that seal the documents, it’s often hard to get access to warrants. Similar issues exist in many state courts.

Even against this landscape, legal experts say recordkeeping and access problems in Mississippi’s justice courts are extreme.

“It would be very, very atypical to have a jurisdiction where you never see any warrant materials,” said Katie Townsend, legal director for the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. “That’s just not how it works.”

After Taylor’s killing, which occurred as police tried to enter her apartment to search for drugs they believed had been hidden there by a former boyfriend, activists called for bans on no-knock raids. But researchers and academics have little data about how often and why police use no-knock warrants.

Limited access to court records is part of the problem. A recent Washington Post effort to identify how many people have been killed in recent years during the execution of no-knock search warrants was hampered by sealed, missing or otherwise secret records.

“You can’t do justice in a corner,” said retired U.S. Magistrate Judge Stephen Smith, who reviewed applications for search warrants when he sat on the bench in Houston. He’s a vocal advocate for greater transparency in the process. “You have to see what judges are doing. It goes to the legitimacy of our legal system.”

What Happens When Police Burst in Police raided Antoine Bryant’s home in Greenville, Mississippi, to execute a no-knock search warrant in June 2019. He was charged with possessing a firearm as a convicted felon. (Rory Doyle for ProPublica)

In Mississippi, no-knock raids have caused fear, injuries and even death.

Two federal lawsuits over people who were shot in no-knock raids have been settled this year; a third suit over injuries caused in a raid is ongoing. Another federal suit involves a dispute about whether sheriff’s deputies entered without knocking. And in 2020, a state appeals court upheld damages awarded over a botched no-knock raid conducted several years before.

“It’s so dangerous for these guys to go in there the way they do,” said Michael Carr, a lawyer who has represented both clients whose homes have been searched and deputies who have been sued over such raids. “I’ve seen them kicking in people’s doors, and you’ve got little kids in there.”

Lawsuits Filed Over No-Knock Raids in Mississippi

Shot 17 Times Coahoma County sheriff’s deputies shot Maurice Mason at least 17 times after breaking down the door to search the home where he was staying in March 2020. Mason, who survived, was not the target of the search, was unarmed and was never charged with a crime. Mason sued the county, which denied any wrongdoing; it settled the lawsuit this year.

Grabbed a Gun When Police Burst In In January 2020, Coahoma deputies (the same ones who would later shoot Maurice Mason) burst into Trekevious Hayes’ home and shot him. In a court filing, he said he retrieved a gun for self-defense after the police shot first. Coahoma County Sheriff Charles Jones, however, said that deputies announced themselves and Hayes shot first.

Authorities charged Hayes with aggravated assault for allegedly shooting at the officers. He has not been indicted.

Shot While Holding an Air Gun In October 2015, Monroe County sheriff’s deputies shot and killed Ricky Keeton during a 1 a.m. no-knock raid. In depositions, deputies said he fired a pellet pistol and they shot back; his girlfriend said he thought someone was breaking in.

In September 2022, Monroe County agreed to settle a federal lawsuit over his death for $690,000, though the settlement hasn’t been finalized.

Raided the Wrong House In April 2015, state narcotics agents raided the wrong house in Vicksburg, forcing Henry and Rita Hunter to the floor at gunpoint — even after local police tried to intervene. A judge awarded the couple $50,000 following a civil trial.

No-knock warrants arose at the onset of the war on drugs under President Richard Nixon. Proponents argued that police had to be able to enter buildings without warning so suspects couldn’t destroy evidence or open fire on officers.

Despite complaints about the violence associated with these warrants, their use grew. The debate eventually reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which considered the issue in three key cases and ruled that no-knock warrants must be the exception, not the rule.

In a key 1997 ruling, U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the court’s majority that if no-knock searches were broadly sanctioned, “the knock-and-announce element of the Fourth Amendment’s reasonableness requirement would be meaningless.”

Those rulings mean police must not only show a judge why they have probable cause to believe that the search will yield evidence of a crime, but they must also explain why the circumstances of the case justify a no-knock warrant.

That’s why Nordstrom grew concerned by the frequency of no-knock raids in Greenville. In a court filing, Nordstrom wrote that she had identified one case in which Municipal Judge Michael Prewitt allegedly signed a no-knock warrant even though police hadn’t asked for one on the application. She wanted to see if the judge frequently approved no-knocks without sufficient evidence.

Nordstrom sent her investigator to Greenville Municipal Court. Although Greenville authorities acknowledged that most search warrants in the city were no-knocks, the municipal court had no records of any searches authorized by Prewitt, the city’s only municipal judge for most of the prior two decades.

Nordstrom and Prewitt sparred in the May 2021 court hearing over whether the no-knock warrant in Bryant’s case was justified. Prewitt took the witness stand and acknowledged saying that he could issue a no-knock search warrant even to look for a sweater, but he denied “rubber-stamping” applications for no-knock warrants.

His explanation for signing so many no-knock warrants? Police conduct a lot of drug investigations in Greenville.

In an email to the Daily Journal and ProPublica, Prewitt said he meant to suggest that a no-knock warrant might be necessary to recover a sweater if it had forensic evidence that could easily be destroyed. (He did not offer that explanation when he testified in court.)

Greenville Police Chief Marcus Turner said his officers don’t execute no-knocks now due to staffing turnover among his investigators, but he plans to reinstate the raids.

Nordstrom couldn’t convince the federal judge overseeing Bryant’s case to throw out the evidence obtained in the search. Bryant ended up pleading guilty, but he has appealed the judge’s ruling on the no-knock warrant.

“I was so appalled by the no-knocks and how prevalent they are in that county,” Nordstrom said. “It would have been nice to figure out if there was a pattern.”

Reasons for Missing Warrants Vary

In any court, the clerk’s office, with its shelves upon shelves of file folders, is the place to go if you’re looking for key records in a criminal proceeding. Arrest warrants. Bail bonds. Judge’s orders. But not, in some of Mississippi’s justice courts, search warrants.

These are important documents. The warrant itself identifies the place police will search. The application for a no-knock warrant says why officers believe they should be allowed to barge into someone’s home without announcing themselves. The property inventory says what police seized during the search. Waller, the retired chief justice, and Matt Steffey, an attorney and law professor, said all that paperwork is supposed to be at the courthouse.

Warrants issued by Greenville’s municipal judge must be returned to the court, according to rules issued by the state Supreme Court. An investigator for a federal public defender didn’t find any there. (Rory Doyle for ProPublica)

“We don’t keep those,” said Lamar County Justice Court Clerk Sandra Owen.

“Usually the return goes back to the sheriff’s offices,” said Jones County Justice Court Clerk Stacy Walls.

“I hardly ever see search warrants — before, during or after,” said Marion County Justice Court Clerk Wynette Parkman.

But Mississippi’s rules are clear: Law enforcement must bring search warrants back to court after serving them. Virtually all state courts in the country, as well as federal courts, have similar requirements.

“There needs to be a record that isn’t squirreled away in a law enforcement file,” said Steffey, who was involved in writing the rules of criminal procedure.

ProPublica and the Daily Journal surveyed all 82 county justice courts in Mississippi, as well as municipal courts in the state’s 10 largest cities. Although any judge in Mississippi can sign a search warrant, municipal and justice court judges commonly handle them.

More than a third of Mississippi’s justice courts are breaking rules that require them to keep all search warrant records. That includes 15 justice courts that have no search warrants among their records and 16 that have only some.

The reasons for the missing warrants vary because no two justice courts operate exactly the same way. Clerks say they don’t know when judges sign warrants, so they don’t know if police fail to bring a warrant back. In some counties, law enforcement agencies return some warrants but not others, and clerks don’t know why. Some counties have warrants only if charges were filed.

Few justice courts even keep a list of issued search warrants, making it easy for these documents to fall through the cracks.

Check If Your County’s Justice Court Lets the Public Access Search Warrants !function(){"use strict";window.addEventListener("message",(function(e){if(void 0!==e.data["datawrapper-height"]){var t=document.querySelectorAll("iframe");for(var a in e.data["datawrapper-height"])for(var r=0;r


This content originally appeared on Articles and Investigations - ProPublica and was authored by by Caleb Bedillion, Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2022/10/04/mississippis-missing-search-warrants-prevent-scrutiny-of-no-knock-raids/feed/ 0 338333
Ardern spurns National’s plans on curbing NZ violent gang behaviour https://www.radiofree.org/2022/06/12/ardern-spurns-nationals-plans-on-curbing-nz-violent-gang-behaviour/ https://www.radiofree.org/2022/06/12/ardern-spurns-nationals-plans-on-curbing-nz-violent-gang-behaviour/#respond Sun, 12 Jun 2022 20:00:23 +0000 https://asiapacificreport.nz/?p=75179 RNZ News

The New Zealand government is considering more action to crack down on violent gang behaviour but has dismissed the idea of a ban on wearing gang patches in public.

There have been a number of shootings and arson attacks in Auckland and Northland in recent weeks linked to escalating tensions between the Killer Beez and Tribesmen.

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern told Morning Report the government had asked police what other tools they wanted.

She said she expected to receive further advice soon.

She said changes had been made to widen the criteria for asset seizures and firearm prevention orders legislation was currently before select committee.

It was clear that the current outbreak of violence centred on escalating tensions between two gangs and the clear advice from experts was about the need “to come down hard on that behaviour”.

The police had taken such action with multiple arrests, multiple search warrants executed and 600 rounds of ammunition seized.

‘More tools needed?’
“We’ve asked them [police] to tell us in that environment are there more tools that you need,” she said.

The government had met them again last week and she was expecting more advice from them soon.

“We are moving as fast as we can where the police identify issues we can support them on.”

New policy would not go before cabinet later today — changes did not happen in a day or a week but the government was seeking to have the work expedited.

Asked if it would include increased stop and search powers and banning gang patches in public as suggested by opposition National Party leader Christopher Luxon on Saturday, she said the police were in the best position to identify what would work best.

“This idea of gang patch bans — it’s been tried in other countries. It’s often a reactionary response you can see from politicians and when they’ve gone back and looked at whether it’s made a difference, review after review in different parts, for instance in Australia, has proved it hasn’t.

“Why don’t we put our energy into things that are going to make a difference.”

She invited National to bring forward other ideas on what would help solve violence from gangs.

“We will be engaging in the ones that the police tell us will make the biggest difference.”

Asked about changes affecting Māori in particular, she said any proposed legislation always went through a Bill of Rights process.

“But what we also always factor in are New Zealanders’ rights and their sense of safety and at present we see an escalation in tensions between gangs. Their behaviour includes examples of blatant lawlessness and that needs to be addressed.”

Reception from new Australian government pleasing
Ardern has hailed her visit to Sydney as a “reset” of a trans-Tasman relationship which had soured in recent years — primarily over Australia’s intransigent stance on its “501” deportation policy.

Following talks with new Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, after which he said he had “listened” to New Zealand’s concern, Ardern said it was a significant improvement on any feedback she had received from Canberra previously.

She agreed Australia has stated its clear intention to continue to deport people which was exactly the same as New Zealand’s approach.

Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern with her Australian equivalent Anthony Albanese
New Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese with New Zealand’s PM Jacinda Ardern at talks last week … Canberra has “listened”. Image: Katie Scotcher/RNZ

It was those “at the extreme end” of the spectrum who were in effect Australians with no connections to Aotearoa that the government was most concerned about being sent here, she said.

It had secured from Albanese a commitment to look at that aspect.

“We’ve not received a reception like that to these issues for a number of years.”

With a ministerial meeting due to be held in three weeks Ardern said she will be looking for signs of progress but it was too soon to expect a timeframe for action.

This article is republished under a community partnership agreement with RNZ.


This content originally appeared on Asia Pacific Report and was authored by APR editor.

]]>
https://www.radiofree.org/2022/06/12/ardern-spurns-nationals-plans-on-curbing-nz-violent-gang-behaviour/feed/ 0 306332